2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11676-018-0746-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance history, species diversity, and structural complexity of a temperate deciduous forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are consistent with previous reports, such as Endris et al (2017); Kacholi (2014) that increasing tree size classes results in a drastically decreased number of species and Shannon diversity index. Basal area and AGC were increased from smaller to bigger size classes in the BP and MP forests (Goode et al 2020). The SP forest also had the lowest AGC compared to the other 2 sites, especially in the biggest dbh class (Figure 2D-E).…”
Section: Size Class Distributionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The results are consistent with previous reports, such as Endris et al (2017); Kacholi (2014) that increasing tree size classes results in a drastically decreased number of species and Shannon diversity index. Basal area and AGC were increased from smaller to bigger size classes in the BP and MP forests (Goode et al 2020). The SP forest also had the lowest AGC compared to the other 2 sites, especially in the biggest dbh class (Figure 2D-E).…”
Section: Size Class Distributionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…vegetation density, height and vertical variation in cover), standardised metrics allow for straightforward comparison of the structure of plant communities between habitats and over time (McElhinny et al, 2005). In the context of forestry management, such comparisons can elucidate the effects of different forestry practices on stand structure (Castro‐Izaguirre et al, 2016; Chamberlain et al, 2021; Deere et al, 2020; Goode et al, 2020; Juchheim et al, 2020; Munro et al, 2009; Parrotta et al, 1997; Põldveer et al, 2021) and above‐ground primary production (Dănescu et al, 2016; Hardiman et al, 2011; Ishii et al, 2004; LaRue et al, 2018; Mensah et al, 2020). Variation in vegetation structure—whether driven by human activity or arising naturally across biotic and abiotic gradients—has also been linked to variation in a number of important ecological functions, including cascading effects on faunal diversity (Iezzi et al, 2018; Ishii et al, 2004; Morante‐Filho et al, 2018; Sukma et al, 2019), microclimate regulation (Ehbrecht et al, 2017; Guimarães‐Steinicke et al, 2021; Rissanen et al, 2019) and species interactions (Kostenko et al, 2015; Langellotto & Denno, 2004; McDonnell & Stiles, 1983; Warfe & Barmuta, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%