The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2020
DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2020.1744046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance estimator and smith predictor-based active rejection of stick–slip vibrations in drill-string systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to that, the nominal system (7) is reconstructed into the following form by the incorporation of time‐varying input delay into account: trueζ˙wifalse(tfalse)=Awζwifalse(tfalse)+Bwffalse(ζwifalse(tfalse)false)+Cwûifalse(tprefix−dfalse(tfalse)false)+atruej=1nGijHζwifalse(tfalse),zwifalse(tfalse)=Dwζwifalse(tfalse), where ζwi(t) and zwi(t) represent the state and output vector of the nominal system with input delay and Aw, Bw, Cw, and Dw denote the given coefficient matrices with suitable dimensions. It should be mentioned that in the existing literatures (see References 29‐32), the ESP‐based approach is widely used to compensate and reject the delay phenomenon in control input channel. As a follow‐up, the state space representation of ESP is given by trueζ˙eifalse(tfalse)...…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to that, the nominal system (7) is reconstructed into the following form by the incorporation of time‐varying input delay into account: trueζ˙wifalse(tfalse)=Awζwifalse(tfalse)+Bwffalse(ζwifalse(tfalse)false)+Cwûifalse(tprefix−dfalse(tfalse)false)+atruej=1nGijHζwifalse(tfalse),zwifalse(tfalse)=Dwζwifalse(tfalse), where ζwi(t) and zwi(t) represent the state and output vector of the nominal system with input delay and Aw, Bw, Cw, and Dw denote the given coefficient matrices with suitable dimensions. It should be mentioned that in the existing literatures (see References 29‐32), the ESP‐based approach is widely used to compensate and reject the delay phenomenon in control input channel. As a follow‐up, the state space representation of ESP is given by trueζ˙eifalse(tfalse)...…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27][28] In particular, the Smith predictor (SP)-based control strategy have procured a greater attention among research communities for various dynamical systems with input delays. [29][30][31] Although, it cannot achieve productive performances ahead the time-varying input delays. Thus, the SP approach is developed as an extended Smith predictor (ESP) approach by incorporating the main feedback path in the conventional SP block.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over the years, the most eminent researchers tackled this problem through several control solutions, for example, integer and fractional order PID control [6], model predictive control [7], Smith predictor [5,8,9], communication disturbance observer [10,11], sliding mode control [12], and switching control [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%