Distrusted disclosures: Deception drives anti-transgender but not anti-atheist prejudice

Abstract

IntroductionTransgender individuals face high levels of prejudice in interpersonal relationships. However, limited experimental research has examined the role of identity disclosure on anti-transgender prejudice.MethodsDrawing upon research on distrust and identity disclosure, two between-participants experiments (total n = 802) examined the role of intentional and unintentional identity disclosure on negative attitudes (Studies 1 & 2), perceived deception (Studies 1 & 2) and distrust (Study 2) toward two potentially concealable and historically distrusted identities (transgender and atheist). Specifically, the current studies examine the impact of a target’s stigmatized identity (transgender or atheist) and method of disclosure (intentional or unintentional) on perceptions of the target, perceived deceptiveness, and distrust toward the target.ResultsOur findings demonstrated that compared to atheists, transgender targets elicited greater levels of prejudice and were viewed as more deceptive, and that this effect was amplified if the target did not intentionally reveal their identity. Study 2 demonstrated that perceived deception mediated the relationship between reveal type (i.e., intentional vs. unintentional) and prejudice toward participants who read about a transgender (but not atheist) target.DiscussionWe discuss the implications of these findings for reducing prejudice toward binary transgender individuals, particularly those who do not voluntarily disclose their identity.

What do we know about religion and interreligious peace? A review of the quantitative literature

“…Thus, religious ingroup favoritism seems to show less in behavior than in attitudes. It may further matter how religious identities are conveyed as this is not uniform across studies (Timming and Perrett, 2016;Galen et al, 2022;Totton et al, 2023). Second, only established identity groups show ingroup favoritism.…”