District Governance and Improved Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health in South Africa: Pathways of Change

Abstract

District-level initiatives to improve maternal, neonatal and child health (MNCH) generally do not take governance as their primary lens on health system strengthening. This paper is a case study of a district and sub-district governance mechanism, the Monitoring and Response Unit (MRU), which aimed to improve MNCH outcomes in two districts of South Africa. The MRU was introduced as a decision-making and accountability structure, and constituted of a "triangle" of managers, clinicians and information officers. An independent evaluation of the MRU initiative was conducted, three years after establishment, involving interviews with 89 district actors. Interviewees reported extensive changes in the scope, quality and organization of MNCH services, attributing these to the introduction of the MRU and enhanced support from district clinicians. We describe both the formal and informal aspects of the MRU as a governance mechanism, and then consider the pathways through which the MRU plausibly acted as a catalyst for change, using the institutional constructs of credible commitment, coordination and cooperation. In particular, the MRU promoted the formation of non-hierarchical collaborative networks; improved coordination between community, PHC and hospital services; and shaped collective sense-making in positive ways. We conclude that innovations in governance could add significant value to the district health system strengthening for improved MNCH. However, this requires a shift in focus from strengthening the front-line of service delivery, to change at the meso-level of sub-district and district decision-making; and from purely technical, data-driven to more holistic approaches that engage collective mindsets, widen participation in decision-making and nurture political leadership skills.

Providers' Definitions of Quality and Barriers to Providing Care: a Qualitative Study in Rural Mpumalanga Province, South Africa

“…Given the breadth of existing evidence documenting shortages in foundations of quality care at PHC facilities in South Africa, future research should include providers as partners in quality improvement efforts, letting their perspectives inform initiatives and planning. The issues in resource allocation and support and supervision identi ed t with the Lancet Global Health Commission's recommendations, and other research conducted in Mpumalanga Province (42), for health systems to focus less on individual provider/clinic interventions, and try more meso (district) and macro (provincial/national) approaches.…”

Dispensing Antiretrovirals During Covid-19 Lockdown: Pathways to Health System Resilience in Uganda

“…We adopted a qualitative case study design [25]. We utilized a qualitative approach because we aimed to explore the notion of health-system resilience [22] from the perspective of diverse actors in district health systems, [26] namely frontline health workers, district health teams and recipients of HIV care. The study design was conceptually informed by the analytical framework by Lévesque and colleagues [27] which emphasizes a multi-level analytical lens in understanding the complex dynamics involved in access to healthcare which incorporates the health-system, organizations, providers, individual-level and contextual factors [28], [29].…”

The whole is more than the sum of the parts: establishing an enabling health system environment for reducing acute child malnutrition in a rural South African district

“…The research team met on a regular basis, iteratively developing the key conclusions of the study. The findings were documented in a draft technical report and validated in a feedback workshop held in the district after which the report was finalized (Schneider et al ., 2017).…”