2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2018.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributive structure-properties relationship for flash point of multiple components mixture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To accelerate the exploration of material design spaces, the material science community has recently paid much attention to machine learning-based data-driven approaches to the material design. Although most of molecular machine learning studies have focused on single-component systems, attempts have also been made to model properties of multicomponent molecular systems using datasets generated from massive computer simulations or systematic experiments. However, it is rarely possible to obtain sufficient datasets for multicomponent materials due to the huge chemical space involved, and therefore, handling of a machine learning task on sparse datasets, which are produced on a trial-and-error basis during the process of the material design, is needed to extend the applicability of machine learning-based approaches for the multicomponent materials design. However, such a machine learning task is still challenging for current molecular machine learning models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To accelerate the exploration of material design spaces, the material science community has recently paid much attention to machine learning-based data-driven approaches to the material design. Although most of molecular machine learning studies have focused on single-component systems, attempts have also been made to model properties of multicomponent molecular systems using datasets generated from massive computer simulations or systematic experiments. However, it is rarely possible to obtain sufficient datasets for multicomponent materials due to the huge chemical space involved, and therefore, handling of a machine learning task on sparse datasets, which are produced on a trial-and-error basis during the process of the material design, is needed to extend the applicability of machine learning-based approaches for the multicomponent materials design. However, such a machine learning task is still challenging for current molecular machine learning models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the molecular DNN models currently proposed are essentially for single-component systems and cannot be directly applied to multicomponent systems due to limitations in terms of inability to handle composition information and an arbitrary number of molecular structures. Therefore, most of existing approaches for machine learning of multicomponent molecular systems are still descriptor-based ,, (see Figure d for typical cases). Another requirement for molecular DNN models in terms of application on multicomponent molecular systems is permutation invariance of input components, a mathematical property of a model whereby the order of components in its input is essentially independent of its output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows the training on both data from pure compounds and fuels. The concept of weighted average descriptor has already been successfully applied for mixtures with only a few compounds, e.g., for the prediction of flash point. ,, We transfer this approach to jet fuels, mixtures of hundreds of possible molecules, with isomers that are not further identified by the GC × GC composition measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, QSPR techniques have been successfully used for the prediction of different properties for pure chemicals, which have been extensively reviewed elsewhere [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. However, only a few studies have been completed on QSPR models for mixtures [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ], due to the complexity of the structure description of the mixtures. In most studies, the molecular descriptors for each pure chemical were combined by mole-weighted averaging to derive mixture descriptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%