2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-009-9172-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributive Full Lambek Calculus Has the Finite Model Property

Abstract: We prove the Finite Model Property (FMP) for Distributive Full Lambek Calculus (DFL) whose algebraic semantics is the class of distributive residuated lattices (DRL). The problem was left open in [8,5]. We use the method of nuclei and quasiembedding in the style of [10, 1].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finite model property for DRL was established in [12] and for BI it was proved in [10]. We extend these results by proving the finite model property (FMP) for many simple extensions of DRL and of GBI, actually for many simple extensions nGBI, namely axiomatized by certain equations/sequents that do not involve divisions and implication, but otherwise can have any combination of the other connectives.…”
Section: Finite Model Propertymentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finite model property for DRL was established in [12] and for BI it was proved in [10]. We extend these results by proving the finite model property (FMP) for many simple extensions of DRL and of GBI, actually for many simple extensions nGBI, namely axiomatized by certain equations/sequents that do not involve divisions and implication, but otherwise can have any combination of the other connectives.…”
Section: Finite Model Propertymentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Although not stated explicitly in [12], it can be inferred from the proof that it is possible to use only the model-checker, since an upper-bound for a countermodel (if it exists) can be estimated. The proof of the FMP of DRL given there is based on a proof search for the given sequent, but because of the rule ( c) the naive exhaustive proof search is not finite; the FMP is established in [12] without showing or claiming that a finite proof search is possible. Our first result in this section is to show that a finite proof search is possible, and from there we easily deduce the FMP, for all the extensions mentioned above, including extensions of GBI.…”
Section: Finite Model Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A theorem of Urquhart [69] implies that the equational theory of DMM is undecidable, whereas results in [10,36,47] show that the respective varieties of distributive and of square-increasing IRLs are generated by their finite members, whence their equational theories are decidable. (In the squareincreasing case, the complexity of any decision procedure is known to be immense [71].…”
Section: Lemma 42 a De Morgan Monoid Is Integral Iff It Is A Booleamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , Buszkowski proved the FMP for BCI , which is the implicational fragment of MAILL . In , Kozak proved the FMP for Distributive Full Lambek Calculus ( DFL ) whose algebraic semantics is the class of distributive residuated lattices ( DRL ). For a review on the FMP for substructural logics, we refer to .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%