1993
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/42.2.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributions of Tree Comparison Metrics--Some New Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
209
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
209
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of the supertree topology with the supertree obtained only from the molecular gene trees reveals a difference of only 1.1% (with 229 species in common) as measured by a normalized partition metric [79,80] (Table 3; Additional file 3). This stands in sharp contrast to the value of 43.7% (for 265 species) in comparison to the supertree derived from the literature trees only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of the supertree topology with the supertree obtained only from the molecular gene trees reveals a difference of only 1.1% (with 229 species in common) as measured by a normalized partition metric [79,80] (Table 3; Additional file 3). This stands in sharp contrast to the value of 43.7% (for 265 species) in comparison to the supertree derived from the literature trees only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences were quantified by the normalized partition metric [79,80]. Number of shared taxa and partition metric values appear above and below the diagonal, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S1b) but not in the three nuclear gene trees. Thus, to quantitatively examine the impact of each locus to the concatenated gene tree, we compared the similarity of the concatenated gene tree with the gene tree of each locus by calculating Robinson-Foulds (RF) distance (Steel and Penny, 1993) using package Phangorn (Schliep, 2011) in the statistical program R (R Development Core Team, 2012). These results indicate that the concatenated gene tree is most similar to the cyt-b gene tree (RF distance = 16; Appendix Fig.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could perform a similar analysis for the path distance metric of Steel and Penny (1993), although we have not done so.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 32mentioning
confidence: 99%