2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-020-01605-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributionally robust chance-constrained programs with right-hand side uncertainty under Wasserstein ambiguity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of RHS uncertainty, this connection between (SAA) and (DR-CCP) has been first observed and explored in our previous work [12]. It turns out that this relation is instrumental in improving the MIP formulation of (DR-CCP) with LHS uncertainty given in (8) as well.…”
Section: Connection With the Nominal Chance Constraintmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of RHS uncertainty, this connection between (SAA) and (DR-CCP) has been first observed and explored in our previous work [12]. It turns out that this relation is instrumental in improving the MIP formulation of (DR-CCP) with LHS uncertainty given in (8) as well.…”
Section: Connection With the Nominal Chance Constraintmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…We then exploit this connection between (DR-CCP) and SAA to address the (easier) case of RHS uncertainty. Our proposed approach in [12] provides stronger formulations and valid inequalities for (DR-CCP), which are instrumental in solving instances that are an order of magnitude larger than those in the literature, from 100s of scenarios to 1000s of scenarios. In this paper, we further explore this connection between (DR-CCP) and SAA to address the more difficult case of LHS uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problems have long been studied in robust optimization community for ordinary optimization problems in which the objective function and the constraint functions are explicitly formulated (in contrast to expensive black-box functions as we consider in this study) [Scarf, 1958, Rahimian andMehrotra, 2019]. DRCC problem with explicitly formulated objective and constraint functions were also studied in [Xie, 2021, Ho-Nguyen et al, 2021, and they were applied to practical problems called power flow optimization [Xie andAhmed, 2017, Fang et al, 2019]. On the other hand, the study of DRO problems for black-box functions with high evaluation cost has only recently started.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, by exploiting the right-hand-side (RHS) uncertainty, we drive an MILP reformulation based on the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) interpretation for DR chance constraints pointed out by Xie (2019), Chen et al (2018). Recently, based on the CVaR (primal) interpretation, Ho- Nguyen et al (2021) provide an MILP reformulations for joint DRCC programs with RHS uncertainty. Different from their work, our results are derived from the dual perspective of CVaR.…”
Section: Summary Of Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%