2017
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhx083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributional Implications of Government Guarantees in Mortgage Markets

Abstract: We analyze the removal of the credit-risk guarantees provided by the governmentsponsored enterprises (GSEs) in a model with agents heterogeneous in income and house price risk. We find that wealth inequality increases, driven by higher mortgage spreads and housing rents. Housing holdings become more concentrated. Foreclosures fall. The removal benefits high-income households, while hurting low-and mid-income households (renters and highly leveraged mortgagors with conforming loans). GSE reform requires compens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jeske, Krueger, and Mitman (2013) find that removing government guarantees for the GSEs would help low-income and low-asset households, increase aggregate welfare by 0.5%. In contrast, Gete and Zecchetto (2017) find that abolishing the GSEs would hurt low-and midincome households, help high-income households. Both papers find that the home ownership rate would decrease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Jeske, Krueger, and Mitman (2013) find that removing government guarantees for the GSEs would help low-income and low-asset households, increase aggregate welfare by 0.5%. In contrast, Gete and Zecchetto (2017) find that abolishing the GSEs would hurt low-and midincome households, help high-income households. Both papers find that the home ownership rate would decrease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…34 Reducing the CLLs to zero could therefore have a substantial effect on the homeownership rate. Our paper is therefore complementary to theoretical papers that simulate counterfactuals in which government guarantees are entirely eliminated such as Jeske, Krueger, and Mitman (2013), Elenev, Landvoigt, and Van Nieuwerburgh (2016) and Gete and Zecchetto (2017).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other recent work considers other potential consequences of the GSEs for the macroeconomy. Elenev, Landvoigt, and Van Nieuwerburgh (2016) address the consequences of government mortgage guarantees for financial fragility, and both Jeske, Krueger, and Mitman (2013) and Gete and Zecchetto (2018) address the consequences of the GSEs' subsidies for household wealth. 3…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 In a recent model similar to Jeske, Krueger, and Mitman (2013), Gete and Zecchetto (2015) argue that the poor, high-credit risk households suffer a disproportionate increase in the cost of mortgage credit from an abolition of GSEs, offsetting the reduction in inequality emphasized by Jeske et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%