2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2017.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution patterns and morphology of sensilla on the antennae of Plutella xylostella (L.)—A scanning and transmission electron microscopic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are some significant differences in the sensilla dimensions between the sexes ( Table 2). The average antennal subsegment length is longer in males than that in females, with the same result as other species reported previously (Wee et al, 2016;Yan et al, 2017), which can be explained by the fact that males are often regarded as receptors in sexual chemical communication, so they need more antennal sensorial zone for pheromone and allelochemical perception (Romero-López et al, 2010). Besides, the lengths of ST, SB, SC, SA, and SS for males are greater than those for females, whereas BB is shorter for males than that for females.…”
Section: Differences Between Sexessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there are some significant differences in the sensilla dimensions between the sexes ( Table 2). The average antennal subsegment length is longer in males than that in females, with the same result as other species reported previously (Wee et al, 2016;Yan et al, 2017), which can be explained by the fact that males are often regarded as receptors in sexual chemical communication, so they need more antennal sensorial zone for pheromone and allelochemical perception (Romero-López et al, 2010). Besides, the lengths of ST, SB, SC, SA, and SS for males are greater than those for females, whereas BB is shorter for males than that for females.…”
Section: Differences Between Sexessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The functions of these sensilla are not well documented. According to previous studies, they are likely related to the detection of host plant odors (Yan et al, 2017) or may act as mechanoreceptors (Faucheux, 1999).…”
Section: Morphology and Potential Functions Of Antennal Sensillummentioning
confidence: 97%
“…800 m) and were reared in the laboratory of Shanxi Agricultural University. The rearing protocol was the same as that previously described by Yan et al (2017). The DBM pupae were collected and individually placed in transparent cylindrical glass tubes (8 cm in length, 2 cm in diameter), which were maintained at 25 ± 1°C, 70 ± 5% RH and a photoperiod of 14:10 hr (L:D).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In insects, the olfactory system plays a highly important role in detecting odorants involved in sexual communication, social integration, host recognition, and escaping from enemies over a distance (Lopes et al, 2002; Gill et al, 2013; Sun et al, 2014; Xu et al, 2016). The antennae are the primary olfactory organ and bear several types of sensilla (Galizia and Rossler, 2010; Yan et al, 2014, 2017a). The most prominent sensillum types have olfactory functions and contain olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs), which send projections directly to the antennal lobe (AL), the primary olfactory center of the insect brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%