2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2011.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of weld toe stress concentration factors on the central brace in two-planar CHS DKT-connections of steel offshore structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zavvar [24] for SCF design formulae and multiplanarity in KT-joints. As nonoverlapped tubular joints [2] are easy to fabricate and numerous techniques have been developed for assessing their strength and fatigue performances [4,5,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], they are widely used in the construction of many tubular structures. However, when the brace-to-chord diameter ratio (β) is bigger than 0.6, nonoverlapped tubular joints may not be easily designed due to the limited range of geometric validity in many design codes [25,26].…”
Section: Advances In Civil Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zavvar [24] for SCF design formulae and multiplanarity in KT-joints. As nonoverlapped tubular joints [2] are easy to fabricate and numerous techniques have been developed for assessing their strength and fatigue performances [4,5,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], they are widely used in the construction of many tubular structures. However, when the brace-to-chord diameter ratio (β) is bigger than 0.6, nonoverlapped tubular joints may not be easily designed due to the limited range of geometric validity in many design codes [25,26].…”
Section: Advances In Civil Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…us, the parametric formulae of uniplanar tubular joints for SCF prediction may not be suitable for such multiplanar connections. Due to the complexity and high cost involved, however, there have been much fewer research efforts on multiplanar tubular joints, such as Karamanos et al [15] and Chiew et al [16] for SCF parametric equations in XX-joints; Karamanos et al [17,18] and Jiang et al [19] for SCF prediction in DT-joints under axial and bending loads, respectively; van Wingerde et al [20] and Woghiren and Brennan [21] for SCF determination in KK-joints; and Ahmadi et al [22], Ahmadi et al [23], and Ahmadi and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For multi-planar joints, the reader is referred to Karamanos et al (1999) and Chiew et al (2000) (for the SCF calculation in XX-joints); Wingerde et al (2001) (for the SCF determination in KK-joints); Karamanos et al (2002) (for the study of SCFs in DTjoints); Lotfollahi-Yaghin and Ahmadi (2011), Ahmadi et al (2011a, and Ahmadi and Lotfollahi-Yaghin (2012b) (for the comprehensive investigation of SCFs in two-and three-planar tubular KT-joints), among others. Dharmavasan and Aaghaakouchak (1988) indicated that in the case of axial and OPB loadings, careful positioning of the stiffeners considerably reduces the stress concentrations and gives a more uniform stress distribution along the brace/chord intersection.…”
Section: Deterministic Analysis Of Scfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For multi-planar joints, the reader is referred to [28,29] (for the SCF calculation in XX-joints), [30] (for the SCF determination in KK-joints), [31] (for the study of SCFs in DT-joints), and [32][33][34][35] (for the comprehensive investigation of SCFs in two-and threeplanar tubular KT-joints), among others.…”
Section: Stress Concentration Factors In Unstiffened Tubular Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%