The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1002/iroh.200510822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Trichoptera communities in the Hozgargantacatchment (Los Alcornocales Natural Park, SW Spain)

Abstract: The distribution of Trichoptera of the Hozgarganta River (Los Alcornocales Natural Park, SW Spain) in relation with environmental factors was examined.Three groups of species were recognised according to the altitudinal gradient. In the headwaters the caddisflies Rhyacophila fonticola, Lepidostoma hirtum, Silonella aurata, Allogamus gibraltaricus, Hydropsyche infernalis and Diplectrona felix predominated; in the constrained section of the tributaries Polycentropus kingi, Chimarra marginata, Hydropsyche iberoma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise Miserendino and Brand (2007) report discharge and POM as important variables in determining caddisfly community composition. Our results also showed differences in the community structure in each season, with clear differences in autumn-winter and summer assemblages, this is in agreement with observations by Ruiz García et al (2006) at headwater Mediterranean streams. However, only part of the seasonal variation in our data was explained by the RDA, other factors such as competition and predation could account for the unexplained variance in density data (Huryn and Wallace 2000;Allan and Castillo 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Likewise Miserendino and Brand (2007) report discharge and POM as important variables in determining caddisfly community composition. Our results also showed differences in the community structure in each season, with clear differences in autumn-winter and summer assemblages, this is in agreement with observations by Ruiz García et al (2006) at headwater Mediterranean streams. However, only part of the seasonal variation in our data was explained by the RDA, other factors such as competition and predation could account for the unexplained variance in density data (Huryn and Wallace 2000;Allan and Castillo 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…According to our results (RDA analysis), seasonally dynamic variables such as water temperature, discharge, and detritus availability were the main predictors of caddisfly assemblage variation at our study site. These variables are commonly identified as determinants of temporal patterns of aquatic insects in perennial streams, draining deciduous forest (Miserendino & Pizzolón, 2003, 2004Hughes, 2006;Ruiz García et al, 2006;Miserendino & Brand, 2007). As stated by Lytle & Poff (2004) when the timing of floods and droughts is sufficiently predictable among years, the life history strategy of organisms is generally synchronized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nevertheless, macroinvertebrates are by far the most investigated group and studies on seasonal changes have focused on whole communities as well as the composition of particular taxonomic groups (e.g., Plecoptera [67]; Trichoptera [68]; or Chironomidae [69]). …”
Section: Macroinvertebrate Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%