1969
DOI: 10.3133/pp614e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of thorium, uranium, and potassium in igneous rocks of the Boulder batholith region, Montana, and its bearing on radiogenic heat production and heat flow

Abstract: ________________________________________ El Introduction. ____ ______ ___ _ 1 Acknowledgments __ 2 Geologic setting... _____ ___ ___ 2 Distribution of thorium, uranium, and potassium in igneous rocks of the Boulder batholith region _ _ 6 Prebatholith volcanic rocks______ _ 6 Batholith rocks________ _______ ________ 6 Postbatholith volcanic rocks________ _______ 6 Para Distribution of thorium Continued Summary and comparison of thorium, uranium, and potassium abundance data____________________ E10 Nature of var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is consistent with the measured values for the Pioneer Batholith, averaging about 2 /iW/m 5 (Zen, in prep. ) and for the Boulder Batholith, averaging about 3 /iW/m 3 (Tilling & Gottfried 1969), when compared to the typical Archaean cratonal value for N America, about 1 (uW/m 3 (Lachenbruch & Sass 1977). In the models I have used the last value for the source rocks because it may be more representative than the "upper limits" given by the batholiths.…”
Section: Data Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion is consistent with the measured values for the Pioneer Batholith, averaging about 2 /iW/m 5 (Zen, in prep. ) and for the Boulder Batholith, averaging about 3 /iW/m 3 (Tilling & Gottfried 1969), when compared to the typical Archaean cratonal value for N America, about 1 (uW/m 3 (Lachenbruch & Sass 1977). In the models I have used the last value for the source rocks because it may be more representative than the "upper limits" given by the batholiths.…”
Section: Data Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter display a wide variation in U and Th contents typical of highly fractionated granites (Rogers and Ragland, 1961;Tilling and Gottfried, 1969). M.G.1 and M.G.6 (garnetiferous), the most fractionated Murvey granites, contain the highest levels of U.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated by R.H. Mariner (U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1980), "The relatively large helium content, almost certainly, must originate from radioac tive decay in the basement rock, although leakage from the mantle cannot be ruled out without isotopic data." Radioactive decay might be a major source of the geothermal heat (Tilling and Gottfried, 1969;Blackwell and Robertson, 1973;Gabelman, 1976), but further study of this aspect was beyond the scope of this in vestigation. The source of the helium in test hole TX-11 is probably the fractured gneiss, as evidenced by the abnormally large response of the natural gamma logs, but the water is not anomalously radioactive.…”
Section: Gases and Radioactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%