1982
DOI: 10.1109/tcom.1982.1095662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of the Phase Angle Between Two Vectors Perturbed by Gaussian Noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
113
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 407 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in required OSNR when moving from 4-level to 8-level modulation, is at around 6.5 dB in both the cases of single and dual polarization systems, which is close to the theoretical value of 6.3 dB for DQPSK and D8PSK perturbed by Gaussian white noise [8].…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The difference in required OSNR when moving from 4-level to 8-level modulation, is at around 6.5 dB in both the cases of single and dual polarization systems, which is close to the theoretical value of 6.3 dB for DQPSK and D8PSK perturbed by Gaussian white noise [8].…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Alternatively, we substitute (21) into (8), and the SEP for MPSK becomes (23) (24) Note in (24) that, since the ordered physical branches are no longer independent, direct use of the methods given in [21] and [22] requires an -fold nested integration for the expectation operation in (23). This is alleviated using the virtual branch technique by substituting (21) into (20) as (25) Exploiting the fact that 's are independent, (25) becomes (26) where is the th element of . The powerfulness of the virtual branch technique is apparent by observing that the expectation operation in (23) no longer requires an -fold nested integration.…”
Section: ) Sep For Mpsk With Gdcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pdf of the correlated phase difference modulo [−π, π), given in [93,94], is adopted to derive the pdf of the output phase of an FM receiver. Under very high SNRs, the probability of the phase difference lying either on [−2π, −π) or (π, 2π] is small, so the approximation by taking a modulus of [−π, π) is acceptable.…”
Section: Besides These Investigations For General Values Of the Fm Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When K is large, say, K > 8dB, the phase difference pdf can be approximated by the pdf of phase difference modulo [−π, π) [93],…”
Section: Pdf Of the Phase Differencementioning
confidence: 99%