1998
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans1989.39.1033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of the Inclusion Particles in Ferritic Spheroidal Graphite Cast Irons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before SAM analysis, the specimens were machined with notch prior to perform insitu impact tested at À50 C in a SAM vacuum chamber at 10 À10 Pa. Figure 1 shows that little differences in average graphite nodule size ( d d g ), and ferrite grain size ( d d f ) are observed with increasing silicon content. Figures 1(c) and (d) reveal the distribution of the inclusion particles around the eutectic cell walls, 6,7) the area of clustered inclusions can be identified by electrochemical etching. Compare to other samples, the 2.9Si specimen shows the least amount of inclusion particles in the eutectic cell wall regions, however the degree of inclusion clustering become significant as increasing silicon concentration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before SAM analysis, the specimens were machined with notch prior to perform insitu impact tested at À50 C in a SAM vacuum chamber at 10 À10 Pa. Figure 1 shows that little differences in average graphite nodule size ( d d g ), and ferrite grain size ( d d f ) are observed with increasing silicon content. Figures 1(c) and (d) reveal the distribution of the inclusion particles around the eutectic cell walls, 6,7) the area of clustered inclusions can be identified by electrochemical etching. Compare to other samples, the 2.9Si specimen shows the least amount of inclusion particles in the eutectic cell wall regions, however the degree of inclusion clustering become significant as increasing silicon concentration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, inclusion particles were thought by many researchers to be detrimental to mechanical properties of steels, because they acted as the sites for forming micro-voids resulting in cleavage cracks in the process of tensile, cyclic loading or impact testing. 3,6,7) Despite the controversy, the above studies acknowledged the correlations of inclusion particles and the microstructures in commercial steels. In fact, the mechanical properties of ADI are also affected by its matrix microstructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strongly oxidizing elements tend to combine with dissolved oxygen, sulfur or other finely divided oxides suspended in the molten iron and form inclusion particles. [1][2][3] The role of inclusion particles in the performance of mechanical properties has been a controversial subject. Shim et al 4) demonstrated that inclusion particles dispersed in the austempering of medium carbon steels provided potential sites for the heterogeneous nucleation of ferrite during the austenite-ferrite transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%