2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-011-9871-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of the Daily Sunspot Number Variation for the Last 14 Solar Cycles

Abstract: The difference between consecutive daily Sunspot Numbers was analysed. Its distribution was approximated on a large time scale with an exponential law. In order to verify this approximation a Maximum Entropy distribution was generated by a modified version of the Simulated Annealing algorithm. The exponential approximation holds for the generated distribution too. The exponential law is characteristic for time scales covering whole cycles, and it is mostly a characteristic of the Sunspot Number fluctuations an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New analysis methods (e.g., Pop, 2012 ; Arlt et al , 2013 ; Leussu et al , 2013 ) have also been developed and these continue to reveal errors and inconsistencies in the various sunspot number records. As this is being written, there is a significant effort within the solar physics community to reconcile the differences in the sunspot numbers and to provide a more reliable sunspot record (with error estimates) from 1610 to the present.…”
Section: Solar Activity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New analysis methods (e.g., Pop, 2012 ; Arlt et al , 2013 ; Leussu et al , 2013 ) have also been developed and these continue to reveal errors and inconsistencies in the various sunspot number records. As this is being written, there is a significant effort within the solar physics community to reconcile the differences in the sunspot numbers and to provide a more reliable sunspot record (with error estimates) from 1610 to the present.…”
Section: Solar Activity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New analysis methods (e.g. Pop, 2012;Arlt et al, 2013;Leussu et al, 2013) have also been developed and these continue to reveal errors and inconsistencies in the various sunspot number Hoyt and Schatten (1998) (green), and by SILSO in 2013 (black). These sunspot numbers have disagreements as late as 1900.…”
Section: Revised Sunspot Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New analysis methods (e.g. Pop, 2012;Arlt et al, 2013;Leussu et al, 2013) have also been developed and these continue to reveal errors and inconsistencies in the various sunspot number records. As this is being written, there is a significant effort within the solar physics community to reconcile the differences in the sunspot numbers and to provide a more reliable sunspot record (with error estimates) from 1610 to the present.…”
Section: Revised Sunspot Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the classical Maximum Entropy Method using power law conditions, the presented method has some advantages: (i) local conditions allow improving the estimation locally and also measuring its quality with ε (c k ); (ii) the discretised pdf is well suited for a heuristic optimisation approach such as the SA, even for high N p , because there are no intrinsic parameters to be determined (the Lagrange multipliers of the classical approach), which the SA has difficulty finding; (iii) the pdf estimate lies between a uniform pdf, obtained for k H → ∞ and the experimental values pdf, obtained for k H = 0 and σ → 0; a bad pdf estimate obtained for too small k H or σ can be improved by smoothing; (iv) for large N the method works well for σ far from optimal. The method was applied to the study of some asteroid parameters [5] and solar cycles [6].…”
Section: Experimental Verifications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%