2009
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.007351-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of the ACME-arcA gene among meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus and identification of a novel ccr allotype in ACME-arcA-positive isolates

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of ACME (arginine catabolic mobile element)-arcA-positive isolates among meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus (MRSH). ACME-arcA, native arcA and SCCmec elements were detected by PCR. Susceptibilities to 10 antimicrobial agents were compared between ACME-arcA-positive and -negative isolates by chi-square test. PFGE was used to investigate the clonal relatedness of ACME-arcA-positive isolates. The phylogenetic relationships o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
37
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(30 reference statements)
9
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding is in line with the study by Diep et al (8), in which 67% (18/27) of S. epidermidis isolates from nostrils were ACME positive, and Miragaia et al (11), in which 51% (65/127) of S. epidermidis isolates from different sources and widespread geographical origin were ACMEpositive. A recent study also showed a high prevalence (48%) of ACME in Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolates (24). In this study, a higher prevalence of ACME was found in S. epidermidis isolates considered as contaminants (most likely derived from the skin) compared with invasive disease causing isolates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our finding is in line with the study by Diep et al (8), in which 67% (18/27) of S. epidermidis isolates from nostrils were ACME positive, and Miragaia et al (11), in which 51% (65/127) of S. epidermidis isolates from different sources and widespread geographical origin were ACMEpositive. A recent study also showed a high prevalence (48%) of ACME in Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolates (24). In this study, a higher prevalence of ACME was found in S. epidermidis isolates considered as contaminants (most likely derived from the skin) compared with invasive disease causing isolates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In this study, a higher prevalence of ACME was found in S. epidermidis isolates considered as contaminants (most likely derived from the skin) compared with invasive disease causing isolates. It has been suggested that L-arginine catabolism contributes to optimize staphylococcal life on the acidic human skin, which may explain the high prevalence of ACME in typically skin colonizing coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS), such as S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus (10,24). Transfer of ACME from CoNS to the USA300 MRSA clone may also explain why USA300 frequently is colonizing skin regions (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(14,15), Listeria monocytogenes (16), Staphylococcus spp. (17)(18)(19), and Pseudomonas spp. (20); arginine can serve as the sole energy source for growth of a variety of bacteria, including the streptococci (21) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the arc gene cluster (arcCBDAR) encodes a complete arginine deiminase pathway, which converts L-arginine to carbon dioxide, ATP, and ammonia, the last of which is important for survival at low pH (4). In general, ACME allotypes (and variants thereof) are broadly associated with certain coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (2,10,12). ACME carriage is uncommon in MRSA isolates, with the exception of USA300 (ST8-MRSA-IVa), for which evidence suggests that carriage has contributed to the successful spread of this community clone; a previous study showed that deletion of ACME I resulted in a fitness loss for a USA300 strain in a rabbit bacteremia model (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%