Distribution of ³H‐proline within transseptal fibers of the rat following release of orthodontic forces

Abstract

Maxillary right first molar teeth of rats were tipped mesially with an orthodontic appliance for 2 weeks (experimental group), 3H-proline was injected, and orthodontic forces were removed 6 hr later (time 0). The contralateral molar teeth of treated (internal control group) and age- and weight-matched untreated animals (external control group) were also studied. Diastemata were created between the molar teeth by the orthodontic appliance, and transseptal fibers between first and second (P less than 0.001) and second and third molars (P less than 0.005) were significantly lengthened as compared to external and internal controls at time 0. Diastemata between molar teeth were closed 5 days after removal of orthodontic force. Transseptal fibers adjacent to the source of the orthodontic force (mesial region) had the highest mean number of 3H-proline-labeled proteins at time 0 and at all times following removal of the force (P less than 0.001), and had the highest rate of labeled protein removal (P less than 0.001). Half-lives for removal of 3H-proline-labeled transseptal fiber proteins were significantly greater in mesial and distal regions and significantly less in middle regions of experimentals than in corresponding regions of external controls (P less than 0.001). These data suggest the following: 1) transseptal fibers adjust their length by rapid remodeling in regions experiencing a tensile force; 2) collagenous protein turnover within the middle third of the transseptal fibers is more rapid subsequent to release of orthodontic force than during normal physiologic drift, suggesting that this region adapts rapidly to changes in adjacent tooth position and that these fibers do not play a significant role in relapse of orthodontically relocated teeth; and 3) significant differences in turnover rates of 3H-proline-labeled transseptal ligament proteins of external and internal control quadrants suggest that tooth movement produces both local and systemic effects on collagenous protein metabolism.

Age‐dependent changes of the periodontal ligament in rats

“…Most of the studies in which autoradiography was used to examine the age-dependent alterations of the periodontal ligament and that have been published to date focused on the question of how far fibroblast activities or collagen turnover were influenced by nonphysiological impulses (Gould et al, 1983;Johnson, 1989;Rippin, 1976Rippin, , 1978Row and Johnson, 1990). In this study, we investigated the physiological, age-dependent changes of the collagen fiber formation rate of the periodontal ligament of rat molars.…”

“…Sodek (1977) achieved similar results in his study. However, it was impossible to autoradiographically differentiate the, modest, integration of 3 Hproline in non-collagenous structures such as proteoglycans (Row and Johnson, 1990).…”

Biologic Mechanisms in Orthodontic Tooth Movement

“…In the process of tooth movement, bone resorption occurs in areas of pressure and bone deposition occurs in areas of tension, as defined by Wolff's law. 77 In all cases it is apparent that the retention mechanism immediately post removal of the orthodontic appliances is a crucial component of the treatment plan. This bone is subsequently remodeled into organized lamellar bone architecture to provide a stronger alveolar support, a slow process which can take upwards of 6 months.…”

Synthesis of alveolar bone Sharpey's fibers during experimental tooth movement in the rat

“…The appliance for tooth movement used in this study has been used by us in previous studies (Row and Johnson, 1990;Murrell et al, 1996). It was assembled on a plastic model of the rat dentition and was then bonded with cyanoacrylate cement to occlusal surface of the right M1 and to a band surrounding the central incisor teeth.…”