1986
DOI: 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90072-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of spin axes and senses of rotation for 20 large asteroids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only eight objects (2,Pallas,7 Iris,8 Flora,16 Psyche,22 Kalliope,28 Bellona,433 Eros,and 704 Interamnia) are found in the range 80 • < ε < 100 • . This conforms the remark made by Michalowski (1993) and also agrees with Magnusson (1986Magnusson ( , 1990 who analyzes the spin vectors of 20 to 30 asteroids respectively. When quoting the apparent lack of poles with axes close to the ecliptic, this last author attributed this deficiency to an observational selection effect: an asteroid with a pole at a low ecliptic latitude is naturally less suitable to present a significant amplitude of the lightcurve variation.…”
Section: Results and Statisticssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only eight objects (2,Pallas,7 Iris,8 Flora,16 Psyche,22 Kalliope,28 Bellona,433 Eros,and 704 Interamnia) are found in the range 80 • < ε < 100 • . This conforms the remark made by Michalowski (1993) and also agrees with Magnusson (1986Magnusson ( , 1990 who analyzes the spin vectors of 20 to 30 asteroids respectively. When quoting the apparent lack of poles with axes close to the ecliptic, this last author attributed this deficiency to an observational selection effect: an asteroid with a pole at a low ecliptic latitude is naturally less suitable to present a significant amplitude of the lightcurve variation.…”
Section: Results and Statisticssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Thanks to our relatively large sample of 100 asteroids, we were able to analyze the asteroid data and to derive some statistical properties of the rotational characteristics. Concerning the distribution of obliquities, main features are revealed, which agree with previous authors (Drummond et al (1988(Drummond et al ( , 1991; Magnusson (1986Magnusson ( , 1990; Michalowski (1993); Pravec et al (2002)). However, the results in these studies are affected, because they aproximated the orbital plane by the ecliptic for the calculation of the obliquity, while we used the true orbital plane that enabled us to calculate the more accurate value of the obliquity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more recent analysis by the same authors (priv. communication) resulted in a rotation model with slightly different values: λ ecl = 327.3 • , β ecl = +34.7 • , P sid = 7.6273922 h. Both solutions were derived using the epoch and amplitude methods described by Magnusson (1986). These methods are reliable for irregularly shaped bodies and for sufficient lightcurve data covering various aspect angles.…”
Section: Possible Shape and Spin-vector Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poles and shapes for these asteroids have been determined using the Epoch/Amplitude method (see Taylor 1979;Magnusson 1986 andMagnusson et al 1989). Lightcurve data reported in the literature together with lightcurves obtained here for these asteroids have been used in the analysis.…”
Section: Poles and Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%