1990
DOI: 10.1016/0198-0149(90)90015-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of rose bengal stained deep-sea benthic foraminifera from the Nova Scotian continental margin and Gulf of Maine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
177
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
10
177
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The interpretation of staining of benthic foraminifera is rather subjective. One problem of this technique is the fact that Rose Bengal may stain the protoplasm of dead foraminifera, which may be relatively well preserved for a considerable period of time under the anoxic conditions that generally prevail deep in the sediment (Bernhard, 1988;Corliss and Emerson, 1990). As a consequence, a strict application of the staining criteria is most times easy in superficial samples, but may become more critical in the deeper levels.…”
Section: Study Area Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The interpretation of staining of benthic foraminifera is rather subjective. One problem of this technique is the fact that Rose Bengal may stain the protoplasm of dead foraminifera, which may be relatively well preserved for a considerable period of time under the anoxic conditions that generally prevail deep in the sediment (Bernhard, 1988;Corliss and Emerson, 1990). As a consequence, a strict application of the staining criteria is most times easy in superficial samples, but may become more critical in the deeper levels.…”
Section: Study Area Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The almost perfect separation between the group of superficial infaunal taxa (dominated by Nuttallides umboniferus, U. peregrina and U. mediterranea) from a deep infaunal assemblages (dominated by Globobulimina affinis) is striking. The appearance of more oligotrophic shallow infaunal taxa such as H. elegans, N. umboniferus and C. pachydermus (compare Corliss, 1985;Corliss and Emerson, 1990;Corliss, 1991), shows the influence of the gradually decreasing organic flux towards deeper areas. Also rather oligotrophic arborescent agglutinated taxa (Jones and Charnock, 1985), which have not been included in our counting results, are very abundant at this station (575 fragments).…”
Section: Faunal Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Romanek et al 1992) due to incorporation of 13C-depleted metabolic CO2 from a respiring host and its algal-bacterial symbionts (Erez 1978;Williams et al 198 1;Spero and Williams 1988 Benthic foraminifera1 613C departures from bottomwater values can most easily be explained by shell incorporation of :microhabitat pore-water DIC. This explanation is supported by field observations that many benthic foraminifera prefer specific downcore sediment microhabitats (e.g# Corliss 1985) and that microhabitat porewater 613C signatures have been positively correlated with concurrently collected benthic foraminifera1 shell 613C (e.g. McCorkle et al,.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Only the protoplasm of living and recently living foraminifera is believed to be stained by this Ž . method Corliss and Emerson, 1990 . Tests were also counted in two additional intervals in two of the Ž .…”
Section: Core Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%