1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(96)03875-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of roots, arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation and spores around fast-growing tree species in Senegal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
18
1
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
18
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…AMF were present in all roots and rhizosphere soil samples of acacia trees with low (12%) to moderate (67.3%) levels of colonization. This pattern is similar to that observed in other tropical systems such as (0 to 75% colonization) in acacia and other woody legume species in dry deciduous forest areas of Northern Ethiopia (Birhane et al, 2010), (31 to 64% colonization) in acacia and prosopis tree species in Senegal (Ingleby et al, 1997), (35 to 65% colonization) in acacia tree species, in India (Lakshman et al, 2001) and (56 to 73% colonization) in A. farnesiana and A. planifrons, in India (Udaiyan et al, 1996). This study showed intra-and interspecific variations in AM colonization among acacia plants (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AMF were present in all roots and rhizosphere soil samples of acacia trees with low (12%) to moderate (67.3%) levels of colonization. This pattern is similar to that observed in other tropical systems such as (0 to 75% colonization) in acacia and other woody legume species in dry deciduous forest areas of Northern Ethiopia (Birhane et al, 2010), (31 to 64% colonization) in acacia and prosopis tree species in Senegal (Ingleby et al, 1997), (35 to 65% colonization) in acacia tree species, in India (Lakshman et al, 2001) and (56 to 73% colonization) in A. farnesiana and A. planifrons, in India (Udaiyan et al, 1996). This study showed intra-and interspecific variations in AM colonization among acacia plants (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Low AMF spore numbers were also recorded in a survey of acacia tree species (49 to 67 spores 100 g -1 soil) in India (Lakshman et al, 2001) and in acacia and prosopis tree species (8 to 51 spores 100 g -1 soil) in Senegal (Ingleby et al, 1997). The variation in AMF spore density between samples could be due to factors such as climatic and edaphic properties, spatial and temporal variation, vegetation, host-specificity between fungi and plants, age of the host plants, disturbance, and differential sporulation ability of AMF taxa (Husband et al, 2002;Muthukumar and Udaiyan, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Spores of AM fungi were concentrated mostly in the soil surface layer (0-10 cm), which supports the view that spore production is at a maximum near the soil surface (Abbott and Robson, 1991;Ingleby et al, 1997). Though the spore numbers were not related to AM fungal colonization levels when all the forest types were considered together; significant relationships emerged when the forest types were considered separately (primary forest: r = 0.35; P < 0.002, secondary forest: r = 0.41; P < 0.001 and limestone forest: r = 0.49; P < 0.001, n = 40).…”
Section: Spore Numberssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A decrease in AM colonization levels and root length with AM fungal structures is consistent with the view that mycorrhizal colonization decreases with depth (Abbott and Robson, 1991). However, this contradicts the results of Ingleby et al (1997), which failed to detect any decrease in mycorrhizal colonization levels with increasing soil depth in a legume tree plantation in Senegal. Similarly Moyersoen et al (1998) also failed to find variations in AM colonization levels with soil depth in rainforest in Korup National Park, Cameroon.…”
Section: Mycorrhizal Colonizationsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Enquanto em CaatR permaneceu a vegetação nativa, embora perturbada, em CultP o desmatamento foi total, com substituição da mata nativa por agricultura ou pecuária de subsistência. Na camada de 7,5-15 cm o número de esporos viáveis não diferiu entre categorias de uso do solo, mas foi menor do que na camada superior; este último resultado coincidiu com a tendência encontrada em outros trabalhos (Bellgard, 1993;Ingleby et al, 1997).…”
Section: Resultados E Discussão Esporos Viáveis E Não-viáveisunclassified