2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of roots and root length density in a maize/soybean strip intercropping system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
117
2
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
13
117
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The root length density of 2.0 cm cm (3 scored here for 0Á15 cm depth below the shoot base at 25 DAP corresponds well to published values of 1.8 cm cm (3 for maize at 52 DAP within the row (Gao et al 2010) and 2.0 cm cm (3 for maize at 97 DAP within the row (McGonigle and Miller 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The root length density of 2.0 cm cm (3 scored here for 0Á15 cm depth below the shoot base at 25 DAP corresponds well to published values of 1.8 cm cm (3 for maize at 52 DAP within the row (Gao et al 2010) and 2.0 cm cm (3 for maize at 97 DAP within the row (McGonigle and Miller 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Whereas most studies quantify roots of maize with depth across coarse intervals of 10 cm (Gao et al 2010) or 20 cm (Tardieu 1988), Taboada andAlvarez (2008) recorded maize roots at anthesis using the profile wall method with root abundance scores averaged across multiple plots at each of three sites as 4.2, 3.4, and 2.7, for respective depths of 0Á5 cm, 5Á10 cm, and 10Á15 cm. Thus, even at close to maximum root production, earlier development of root length in the upper profile is still manifest in terms of decreasing quantity of root with increasing depth as designated with the intervals here studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the effect of the soil water content on root growth, root measurements for all three treatments (T1, T2, and T3) were taken in July during both seasons. Horizontal and vertical root distributions of corn and tomato were obtained from a soil transect (Ozier-Lafontaine et al, 1999;Adiku et al, 2001;Gao et al, 2010), which was dug between the tomato and corn strips, and which was on one side of the 60 cm long, 100 cm wide, and 100 cm deep trench (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Root Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the thermal effects of SWC on soil temperature in a soil system with plastic mulch have been studied by many scientists (Mahrer et al, 1984;Hunt et al, 2010), much less similar work has been done for drip-irrigated intercropping systems with plastic mulch. Such systems are much more complicated because the spatial distribution of SWCs is affected by the different water consumptions of two crop species and their overlapping or not overlapping root systems, depending on crop species and their particular growing periods (Gao et al, 2010). The SWCs and root distribution in a dripirrigated intercropping field are thus influenced not only by drip wetting patterns, but also by the root water uptake competition between two crops (Gao et al, 2010;Sampathkumar et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation