1995
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of parthenogenetic cells in the mouse brain and their influence on brain development and behavior.

Abstract: A systematic analysis of parthenogenetic (PG) cell fate within the central nervous system (CNS) was made throughout fetal development and neonatal and adult life. Chimeras were made between PG embryos carrying a ubiquitously expressed lacZ transgene and normal fertilized embryos. After detailed histological analysis, we find that the developmental potential of PG cells is spatially restricted to certain parts of the brain. PG cells are prevalent in telencephalic structures and are largely excluded from diencep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
5
65
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A negative RT-PCR result for the two paternally expressed imprinted genes together with a positive result for UBE3A and H19 in hPESs is consistent with a parthenogenesis origin for the hPES cell lines. Failure of development to term of parthenogenetic embryos was thought to be a consequence of having a uniparental genome [30], and although parthenogenetic stem cells were suggested to have limited differentiation potential due to the lack of paternal imprinting [30,31], modification of specifically imprinted genes was reported to help extend full organismal development and increase the differentiation ability of the ESCs and thus initial oocytes developed into blastocysts. Two ESC lines were obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A negative RT-PCR result for the two paternally expressed imprinted genes together with a positive result for UBE3A and H19 in hPESs is consistent with a parthenogenesis origin for the hPES cell lines. Failure of development to term of parthenogenetic embryos was thought to be a consequence of having a uniparental genome [30], and although parthenogenetic stem cells were suggested to have limited differentiation potential due to the lack of paternal imprinting [30,31], modification of specifically imprinted genes was reported to help extend full organismal development and increase the differentiation ability of the ESCs and thus initial oocytes developed into blastocysts. Two ESC lines were obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though parthenogenetic embryos die shortly after implantation, their cells are capable of participating in normal development of chimeras when aggregated with fertilized embryos (Fundele et al 1989, Nagy et al 1989, Allen et al 1995, Boediono et al 1999. Parthenogenetic cells were detected in some organs and tissues of adult chimeras.…”
Section: Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer In Rabbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of imprinted-gene effects in brain development was pioneered by Keverne, whose studies of chimeric mice showed differential contribution of paternally-expressed imprinted genes to development of limbic brain regions (especially the hypothalamus), and maternally-expressed genes to development of the neocortex (Allen et al 1995;Keverne et al 1996;Keverne 2001a,b). Functional and evolutionary hypotheses for the effects of brain-expressed imprinted genes have been described in detail; these include diverse effects on affect, cognition, attention, feeding behavior, and other central brain functions (Isles et al 2006;Wilkinson et al 2007;Champagne et al 2009), some of which apparently influence resource-related interactions between mothers and offspring.…”
Section: Genomic Imprinting In the Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%