2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67618-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of P2x Receptors in the Urinary Bladder and the Ureter of the Rat

Abstract: Having established the distribution of P2X receptors in normal animal bladder and ureter tissue, it is now possible to perform comparable investigations on normal and diseased human tissue to establish a possible role of P2X receptors in pathogenic events.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
78
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
10
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7d). Consistent with these results, the intracellular localization of the P2X7 receptor is well documented in other models [3739]. The characteristic appearance as stained dots was reported to be distributed close to the membrane but also colocalized with the endoplasmatic reticulum [40].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…7d). Consistent with these results, the intracellular localization of the P2X7 receptor is well documented in other models [3739]. The characteristic appearance as stained dots was reported to be distributed close to the membrane but also colocalized with the endoplasmatic reticulum [40].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Nuclear/perinuclear localization of the wild-type P2X 7 was previously described in epithelial (40,41), neuronal (e.g. Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…P2X 7 immunoreactivity found in the cytoplasm may reflect newly formed receptor en route to be inserted into the plasma membrane, or postactivation internalized, degraded, or recycled receptor [20]. Perinuclear/nuclear P2X 7 immunoreactivity was previously described in epithelial [28,43,44] and other types of cells [45,46], but its biological significance remains unclear. It is unlikely an artifact (i.e., non-specific binding) because it was found in tissues processed in parallel with those not found to express this type of signal (present study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%