1989
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90321-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
29
0
10

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
29
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a controversial issue in the literature. Some studies demonstrate symmetry [5,22], while others confirm our results [8,18]. Perhaps static occlusion is a result of neuromuscular adaptation that gradually leads to definitive and more stable intercuspation with symmetrical force distribution.…”
Section: Diskussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is a controversial issue in the literature. Some studies demonstrate symmetry [5,22], while others confirm our results [8,18]. Perhaps static occlusion is a result of neuromuscular adaptation that gradually leads to definitive and more stable intercuspation with symmetrical force distribution.…”
Section: Diskussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Die Ergebnisse zur Entwicklung der Kaukraftverteilung unterscheiden sich in beiden Untersuchungen jedoch darin, dass bei Kumagai et al [19] eine Abnahme des relativen Anteils der Prä-molaren nachgewiesen wurde, in der vorliegenden Untersuchung dem gegenüber eine leichte Zunahme des Prämolarenanteils an der aktuellen Kaukraft gemessen wurde. and the lowest forces between the incisors [1,5,22]. According to our measurements, the lowest forces exist at the lateral incisors, followed by canines, premolars and then central incisors.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nabeshima et al(1990) also studied occlusion in 90 normal subjects using the T-scan system and obtained similar findings. Analysis of the postoperative occlusion in the patients with mandibular fracture treated by our method produced similar results as those reported by Maness and Podoloff (1989) and Nabeshima et al (1990).…”
Section: Review Of Patientssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, of all currently available methods for quantitative analysis of occlusal contact, the T-scan system may be rated to be the best. In T-scan system analysis of occlusion in 93 normal subjects, Maness and Podoloff (1989) found that the normal dentition was bisymmetrical to the sagittal plane and described that the anteroposterior dynamic center of tooth contact was located at the first molar. Nabeshima et al(1990) also studied occlusion in 90 normal subjects using the T-scan system and obtained similar findings.…”
Section: Review Of Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%