1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00171-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide-receptive, cyclic GMP-producing structures in the rat brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
99
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
12
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative methodologies such as radioimmunoassay may have been more sensitive, however the ability to define specific neuronal populations is lost and in a study examining hippocampal slices, analysis of cGMP radioimmunoassay versus cGMP immunofluorescence intensity showed comparable sensitivities [46]. The lack of detectable cGMP expression in neurons of the RVLM is in accord with a detailed study by De Vente et al [22], who similarly observed cGMP in the NA and nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS) in the brain stem region, but do not comment on its expression in the RVLM, despite the use of invitro stimulation paradigms as applied in this study. In the work by De Vente et al, the importance of IBMX to reveal otherwise non-detectable cGMP populations was stressed [22,47] and this has also been noted by other authors [48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternative methodologies such as radioimmunoassay may have been more sensitive, however the ability to define specific neuronal populations is lost and in a study examining hippocampal slices, analysis of cGMP radioimmunoassay versus cGMP immunofluorescence intensity showed comparable sensitivities [46]. The lack of detectable cGMP expression in neurons of the RVLM is in accord with a detailed study by De Vente et al [22], who similarly observed cGMP in the NA and nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS) in the brain stem region, but do not comment on its expression in the RVLM, despite the use of invitro stimulation paradigms as applied in this study. In the work by De Vente et al, the importance of IBMX to reveal otherwise non-detectable cGMP populations was stressed [22,47] and this has also been noted by other authors [48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…To date, no studies have described the immunohistochemical localisation of neurons capable of expressing cGMP within the C1 region [22]. Given the strong evidence that NO signalling plays a functional role in the RVLM, we sought to identify the cellular targets for NO in the RVLM, visualising cGMP and its neuroanatomical relationship with the C1 cell group, as identified by the presence of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) or phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PNMT), and the more medially located nNOS expressing cell population [18,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this specific issue remains to be experimentally tested, our previous data obtained in both the STN and the striatum, as well as some considerations on the distribution of drug-induced effects among neurons, lead us to hypothesize a role for cGMP in some of the observed effects. Moreover, it must be noted that, with some sparse exception, no co-localization of nNOS and sGC has been observed in the same neurons (De Vente et al, 1998). From this point of view, taking into consideration the NO/cGMP pathway, a locally applied NO donor (e.g.…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms Involved In the No-dependent Modulation mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such gaseous messenger is a modulator of neurotransmission (Prast and Philippu, 2001) and the neuronal isoform of NO-synthase (nNOS), the NO-producing enzyme, is widely distributed in the rat brain (De Vente et al, 1998), including GP (Rodrigo et al, 1994). In a previous study we observed that the systemic administration of 7-nitro-indazole, a preferential inhibitor of nNOS, induced a decrease of the firing rate of responsive GP neurons; similarly, the microiontophoretic application of Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a nonspecific inhibitor of nNOS, induced a decrease in the firing rate of most recorded neurons; furthermore, the local administration of 3-morpholinosydnonimin-hydrocloride (SIN-1), a NO donor, induced an increase of the firing activity of GP neurons (Sardo et al, 2002a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After treatment, slices were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C, washed in phosphate buffered saline with 0.3 % triton X-100 (PBS-TX), and then incubated for 48 hr at 4°C in an anti-cGMP primary antibody (De Vente and Steinbusch, 1992;De Vente et al, 1998). After washing over a period of an hour, slices were incubated in fluorescently labeled secondary antibody overnight (goat anti-sheep, Jackson Immunoresearch Labs, West Grove, PA) at 4°C.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%