2006
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.74.062322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution ofGconcurrence of random pure states

Abstract: Average entanglement of random pure states of an N × N composite system is analyzed. We compute the average value of the determinant D of the reduced state, which forms an entanglement monotone. Calculating higher moments of the determinant we characterize the probability distribution P(D). Similar results are obtained for the rescaled N th root of the determinant, called G-concurrence. We show that in the limit N → ∞ this quantity becomes concentrated at a single point G ⋆ = 1/e. The position of the concentra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us begin our investigation into the indicated statistical aspects of the "geometry of quantum states" [4,14] by noting the two following special cases-which will be extended in certain bivariate directions-of the (univariate determinantal moment) formulas [15][eq. …”
Section: Density-matrix Determinantal Product Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us begin our investigation into the indicated statistical aspects of the "geometry of quantum states" [4,14] by noting the two following special cases-which will be extended in certain bivariate directions-of the (univariate determinantal moment) formulas [15][eq. …”
Section: Density-matrix Determinantal Product Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These last three figures are based on Hibert-Schmidt sampling (utilizing Ginibre ensembles [15]) of random density matrices, using 10, 000 = 100 2 bins. In regard to the two-qubit plot, K.Żyzckowski informally wrote: "A high peak in the upper corner means that: a) a majority of the entangled states is 'little entangled' (small det(ρ T )) or rather, they are 'close'…”
Section: A Range Of Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the transformation U CNOT x y U CNOT † = y z can be simply stated by x = 6 going to xЈ = ␤ j Ј+4·␤ i Ј= 11. All 16 xЈ for CNOT can be written in a vector xЈ = ͑0, 1,14,15,5,4,11,10,9,8,7,6,12,13,2,3͒, denoting the transformation x = ͑0,1,2, ... ,14,15͒ → xЈ. It turns out that XY gate also preserves the Pauli group.…”
Section: Special Case: Markov Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average entanglement of pure states in a two-qubit was computed in [12]. Later, the average entanglement of random pure states of an N × N composite system was analyzed [13]. In this paper, we focus on the effect of an external magnetic field upon the average entanglement of randomly distributed ground state.…”
Section: Average Entanglement Of a Hilbert Subspacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All is known about the entanglement properties of this system, namely that PPT is sufficient and necessary entanglement criterion in this case [10]. In order to investigate the properties of the set of density matrices of a finite size, the notion of average entanglement was introduced [11][12][13][14]. O. Giraud obtained the analytic expressions for the probability density distribution of the linear entropy and the purity for bipartite pure random quantum states [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%