2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of microcrack lengths in bone in vivo and in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bone naturally contains many internal cracks which have arrested at lengths of the order of 0.1 mm, suggesting that this is the typical separation of barriers. Other workers have measured the distances between osteon boundaries and found an average value of about 0.12 mm [42,43]. This distance corresponds to d in our model materials with barriers, for which we found L = 0.53d, so if osteons were functioning in the same way as the barrier in our model materials we would expect an L value of 0.06 mm, very close to the value found here.…”
Section: Case Study: Bonesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Bone naturally contains many internal cracks which have arrested at lengths of the order of 0.1 mm, suggesting that this is the typical separation of barriers. Other workers have measured the distances between osteon boundaries and found an average value of about 0.12 mm [42,43]. This distance corresponds to d in our model materials with barriers, for which we found L = 0.53d, so if osteons were functioning in the same way as the barrier in our model materials we would expect an L value of 0.06 mm, very close to the value found here.…”
Section: Case Study: Bonesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…2012). The contribution of microdamage accumulation to the reduction of fracture resistance has been evaluated in vitro by measuring changes in elastic modulus, strength, and fracture toughness (Macione et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O’Brien observed that the formation of new microcracks was initiated during an early phase of damage, which confirmed the above mentioned hypothesis. New microcracks grew up to reach a maximal length of about 100µm mainly due to cement lines acting as barriers [75], while only 6% of the native microcrack propagated. Thus, the level of damage depends on the phase of the modulus degradation curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%