2021
DOI: 10.1080/03014460.2021.1913223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) genes in a large, multi-centre cohort of Chinese donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequencies of individual KIR genes in our cohort were comparable to the published data in healthy populations 30,31 . The cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation by day 100 post‐transplantation was significantly higher in patients who accepted a KIR2DS1‐positive donor compared to patients who accepted a KIR2DS1‐negative donor [rate/incidence (95%CI) 34·58% (25·42%, 43·74%) vs. 20·21% (14·49%, 25·92%), P = 0·0067] (Fig 1A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frequencies of individual KIR genes in our cohort were comparable to the published data in healthy populations 30,31 . The cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation by day 100 post‐transplantation was significantly higher in patients who accepted a KIR2DS1‐positive donor compared to patients who accepted a KIR2DS1‐negative donor [rate/incidence (95%CI) 34·58% (25·42%, 43·74%) vs. 20·21% (14·49%, 25·92%), P = 0·0067] (Fig 1A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The frequencies of individual KIR genes in our cohort were comparable to the published data in healthy populations. 30,31 The cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation by day 100 posttransplantation was significantly higher in patients who accepted a KIR2DS1-positive donor compared to patients who accepted a KIR2DS1-negative donor [rate/incidence (95%CI) 34Á58% (25Á42%, 43Á74%) vs. 20Á21% (14Á49%, 25Á92%), P = 0Á0067] (Fig 1A). The cumulative incidences indicated that the EBV reactivation rate was higher in patients whose graft was positive for KIR2DS3 than patients whose graft was negative for KIR2DS3 [rate/incidence (95%CI) 37Á25% (23Á52%, 50Á99%) vs. 22Á89% (17Á64%, 28Á15%), P = 0Á030] (Fig 1B).…”
Section: Donor Akir Genes Contribute To Ebv Reactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%