1963
DOI: 10.1021/ac60205a062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Ion Pairs between Immiscible Nonaqueous Solvents.

Abstract: Therefore, these two solvent systems were compared using HMeucine. As shown in Table II, the counting efficiency with the hyamine-water-dioxane system was comparable to that with the hyamine-toluene system. The solubility of this particular amino acid was almost equal in solvents A and C, B and D, respectively, under the conditions employed. Sample preparation was much easier and faster with the hyaminewater-dioxane system than the hyamine-toluene system. The former did not require the prolonged drying and dig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was found that the separation factors were too small to be of practical use. Several metal salts (chloride, bromide, thiocyanate, and nitrate) were extracted to a diethyl ether phase that was equilibrated with a second immiscible phase, being ethanolamine, formamide, or adiponitrile [143]. These solvents could extract nearly all metal complexes from the ether phase with an extraction efficiency of more than 90%.…”
Section: Non-aqueous Solvent Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was found that the separation factors were too small to be of practical use. Several metal salts (chloride, bromide, thiocyanate, and nitrate) were extracted to a diethyl ether phase that was equilibrated with a second immiscible phase, being ethanolamine, formamide, or adiponitrile [143]. These solvents could extract nearly all metal complexes from the ether phase with an extraction efficiency of more than 90%.…”
Section: Non-aqueous Solvent Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few preliminary studies explored utilization of some polar organic solvents to replace water in the MP phase for metal extractions; however, no superior metal separations were observed . Recently, extraction of rare earth elements and transition metals from ethylene glycol (EG) solutions showed higher extraction efficiency and higher separation factors compared to the extraction from aqueous solutions .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12,13] Af ew preliminary studies exploredu tilization of some polar organic solvents to replacew ater in the MP phase for metal extractions; however, no superior metal separationsw ere observed. [14][15][16][17][18] Recently, extractiono fr are earth elements and transition metals from ethylene glycol (EG) solutions showed higher extraction efficiency and highers eparation factors comparedt ot he extraction from aqueous solutions. [19][20][21] These results clearly indicatet hat EG affectst he extraction of metals differently than water.N evertheless,h ow these polar solvents (water and EG) affect metal extraction is not clear yet, and the possibility of using other polar solvents, besides EG, to enhancem etal separations remains unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These early studies did not observe superior metal separations compared to traditional SX. [4][5][6][7][8] The use of polar solvents instead of water in the extraction of metals is called non-aqueous solvent extraction (NASX). 9 Recently, a series of non-aqueous SX systems have been investigated and several enhanced separations have been obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only very few studies explored the utilization of polar organic solvents as the solvent in the MP phase for SX of metals. These early studies did not observe superior metal separations compared to traditional SX 4‐8 . The use of polar solvents instead of water in the extraction of metals is called non‐aqueous solvent extraction (NASX) 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%