Distribution of heavy metal (Pb, Cd and Hg) concentrations in sediment of Bone River, Gorontalo

Kadim, Miftahul Khair; Yuli, Endang H; Arfiati, Diana; Hertika, ‪Asus Maizar Suryanto; Kasim, Faizal

doi:10.13170/depik.11.3.27775

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Future people are likely to suffer from development processes that disregard the environment [65,66]. Constant environmental deterioration affects how ecosystems change, [66,67] While there is a very intimate relationship between humans and their environment, ecosystems [68]. Environmental elements play a role in determining public health [69].…”

Section: Economic Paradox and Environmental Protection Regulatory And...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Addressing the paradox: Why environmental constitutionalism is more than just rights?

Muhtar,

Harun,

Putri

et al. 2024

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Paradoxes exist in environmental constitutionalism, and this article seeks to explain them, particularly by explaining why rights and obligations and complicated enforcement methods all pertain to this topic. This research seeks to understand how environmental constitutionalism may be reimagined in the Indonesian context, with its wide range of environmental problems and frequently insufficient policies, to strengthen justice and sustainability. This study takes a normative stance, examining environmental constitutionalism from a legal and theoretical perspective. The constitutional and legal framework of Indonesia are examined to see how they deal with environmental challenges. The conceptual method, meanwhile, is applied to explore environmental constitutionalism in greater depth than the field of rights. This article proposes that rethinking the roles of the state, society, and the private sector within the constitutional framework is key to solving Indonesia’s environmental problems. The findings show that a rights-only approach to environmental constitutionalism overlooks societal obligations and the socio-political factors that shape environmental policies in Indonesia. By incorporating this contradiction into the constitutional framework, we may be able to create policies that are more inclusive, egalitarian, and sustainable for everybody.

show abstract

Section: Economic Paradox and Environmental Protection Regulatory And...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Addressing the paradox: Why environmental constitutionalism is more than just rights?

Muhtar,

Harun,

Putri

et al. 2024

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Heavy metal pollution of water sources is an issue in many countries, including Indonesia [53]. Due to their toxicity, carcinogenicity, biomagnification, and bioaccumulation, heavy metals are among the most perilous contaminants [54].…”

Section: The Ideological Framework Of Article 33 and The Trapping Of ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Constitutional balance: Synchronizing energy and environmental policies with socio-economic mandates

Abdussamad,

Harun,

Muhtar

et al. 2024

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945) has been a focal topic of normative legal study because of the tension it highlights between the competing goals of economic efficiency and social fairness. Public policy, particularly in the areas of energy and the environment, is impacted by this problem. Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution requires the government to exercise control over natural resources. However, this provision sometimes leads to “constitutional extractivism,” which puts efficiency ahead of social justice and environmental sustainability. This problem is especially noticeable in Indonesia’s mining investments, where a concentration on economic expansion at the expense of environmental and social justice is a real risk. Conventional techniques that place too much emphasis on quantitative data or public engagement need to be abandoned in favour of renegotiating objectives in the socioeconomic agenda from a public policy viewpoint. Indicators of social justice and environmental sustainability should be acknowledged as critical factors in the new paradigm. More study is required to align energy and environmental policy with societal and economic imperatives. The effects on society and the environment must be included in any policy that seeks to promote the use of renewable energy. To ensure that policies are just and lasting, they should be evaluated and revised on a regular basis.

show abstract

Distribution of heavy metal (Pb, Cd and Hg) concentrations in sediment of Bone River, Gorontalo

Cited by 2 publications

References 22 publications

Addressing the paradox: Why environmental constitutionalism is more than just rights?

Addressing the paradox: Why environmental constitutionalism is more than just rights?

Constitutional balance: Synchronizing energy and environmental policies with socio-economic mandates

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About