2004
DOI: 10.3739/rikusui.65.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of freshwater amphipods, Jesogammarus jesoensis and Eogammarus kygi, in the Chitosegawa River system, Hokkaido, northern Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, no difference was found in the ratios of paired and brooding females to the total mature females between UP and DW (Table 1), i.e., the effect of carcasses on oviposition frequency was not proved in this study. It is known that the reproduction of J. jesoensis occurs throughout the year in Naibetsu River, and the seasonal change in the ratio of brooding females is small (Kusano and Ito 2004). It is not known why the ratio of brooding females at both sites was less in 2000 and 2001 than in 2002 and 2003.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, no difference was found in the ratios of paired and brooding females to the total mature females between UP and DW (Table 1), i.e., the effect of carcasses on oviposition frequency was not proved in this study. It is known that the reproduction of J. jesoensis occurs throughout the year in Naibetsu River, and the seasonal change in the ratio of brooding females is small (Kusano and Ito 2004). It is not known why the ratio of brooding females at both sites was less in 2000 and 2001 than in 2002 and 2003.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is little difference between the two sites in terms of stream conditions such as water temperature, velocity, water depth, electrical conductivity, and substrates (Kusano and Ito 2004). The water conditions measured at the time of material collection in April 2000-2003 were 7.3°-12.0°C for water temperature, 7.0-7.1 for pH, and 6.4-7.5 mS m -1 for electrical conductivity; the differences between the two sites were less than 2.6°C, 0.1, 0.4 mS m -1 , respectively.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations