1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf02405298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of fibroblastic colony-forming cells in rabbit bone marrow and assay of their osteogenic potential by anin vivo diffusion chamber method

Abstract: Rabbit bone marrow has been separated into core, intermediate, and endosteal cell populations. When plated out in vitro, each of the fractions gave rise to colonies of fibroblastic cells. The colony-forming efficiency increased from the core population by a factor of 4 to a maximum of 3.4 X 10(-6) in the endosteal fraction. The osteogenic potential of each fraction was determined following their implantation in diffusion chambers into host rabbits. Each of the indices of osteogenesis (alkaline phosphatase acti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…bone marrow-derived bone precursor cells were not hematogenous in origin, as these cells did not express the pan-hematopoietic cell surface antigen CD34 and failed to respond to hematopoietic growth factors (9). Moreover, unlike the murine system, human bone marrow-initiated bone cell cultures cannot be derived from bone marrow stromal cells (9 The relationship between bone marrow-derived human osteoprogenitor cells and past reports on bone formation derived from the colony-forming unit fibroblast (CFU-f) (29)(30)(31) (12,34). Pragmatically, this requires that investigations into the control of a given cellular lineage use purified progenitor cell populations, serum-free culture conditions, and purified (e. g., recombinant) growth factors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bone marrow-derived bone precursor cells were not hematogenous in origin, as these cells did not express the pan-hematopoietic cell surface antigen CD34 and failed to respond to hematopoietic growth factors (9). Moreover, unlike the murine system, human bone marrow-initiated bone cell cultures cannot be derived from bone marrow stromal cells (9 The relationship between bone marrow-derived human osteoprogenitor cells and past reports on bone formation derived from the colony-forming unit fibroblast (CFU-f) (29)(30)(31) (12,34). Pragmatically, this requires that investigations into the control of a given cellular lineage use purified progenitor cell populations, serum-free culture conditions, and purified (e. g., recombinant) growth factors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These investigators further identified an osteogenic cell phenotype in a subpopulation of adherent bone marrow fibroblasts, localized near the (endosteal) bone surface (40,42). These cells are the progeny of fibroblast colony-forming cells (CFC-F) which are serumresponsive, generate heterogeneous populations of cells, and are strongly adherent (43)(44)(45)(46).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that there are several sources of calcifying vascular cells in the arterial wall just as in bone where colony-forming unit fibroblasts (CFU-f) [3,4,29] as well as osteoblasts [23] participate in bone formation. Studies on the nature of the developmental lineages leading to the formation of bone cell types in humans, namely the osteoblast, osteoclast and CFU-f, suggest that osteoclasts may be the progeny of macrophages/monocytes [2,15,23] whereas osteoblast and CFU-f arise in some unknown manner from local mesenchymal cells and, as such, they do not express the panhaematopoietic cell surface antigen CD34 and fail to respond to haematopoietic growth factors [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%