1990
DOI: 10.1202/0002-8894(1990)051<0285:doflso>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Faceseal Leak Sites on a Half-Mask Respirator and Their Association with Facial Dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Face seal leak distributions for FFR utilizing an IRC during fit testing have not been previously reported, but the 26.5% incidence for nasal region leaks in the current study compares favorably with the 32.9% and 36.7% incidences reported in two previous studies addressing leaks in subjects wearing elastomeric half‐mask respirators [Oestenstad et al, 1990; Oestenstad and Bartolucci, 2010]. The nasal region as a major contributor to FFR leakage is recognized [Health and Safety Executive, 2009] and not surprising given its bony prominence and thin skin covering, as well as the variability of nasal features based on such issues as ethnicity, gender, prior trauma, surgery, etc., coupled with the variability in available FFR features (e.g., pliable nose bars, pre‐molded nasal contours, internal flanges, etc.).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…2). Face seal leak distributions for FFR utilizing an IRC during fit testing have not been previously reported, but the 26.5% incidence for nasal region leaks in the current study compares favorably with the 32.9% and 36.7% incidences reported in two previous studies addressing leaks in subjects wearing elastomeric half‐mask respirators [Oestenstad et al, 1990; Oestenstad and Bartolucci, 2010]. The nasal region as a major contributor to FFR leakage is recognized [Health and Safety Executive, 2009] and not surprising given its bony prominence and thin skin covering, as well as the variability of nasal features based on such issues as ethnicity, gender, prior trauma, surgery, etc., coupled with the variability in available FFR features (e.g., pliable nose bars, pre‐molded nasal contours, internal flanges, etc.).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The location of faceseal leak sites on a half-mask respirator by the deposition of a fluorescent tracer aerosol during a standard quantitative fit test was observed by Oestenstad et al (1990). The results of this study indicated that faceseal leaks at the nose and chin were of the greatest importance for the half-mask respirator.…”
Section: Revlew Of Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In these models, the flow rate through the leak hole was predicted by the equation, QL = K(AP)"(Do)~, where QL is the flow rate through the leak hole, K, a, and b are constants, A P is the pressure drop across the respirator filter, and Do is the diame- Oestenstad et al (1990) 0.5-1.0~ 2.70 aConstant a ranges from 0.962 for the 0.5-mm leak hole to 0.562 for the 3.2-mm leak hole.…”
Section: Revlew Of Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tel: 806-742-3563 (extension 229); fax: 806-742-3540; e-mail: james.yang@ttu.edu facepiece leak locations. Oestenstad et al (1990Oestenstad et al ( , 2010 used facial deposition of a fluorescent tracer and black light visualization to photograph leak location and shape on subjects wearing half-mask respirators. They found that facial dimensions were significantly associated with leak location, while gender and respirator size showed a weaker association.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faceseal leakage of an FFR can be significantly impacted by facial dimensions, breathing intensity, and activity (Han and Lee, 2005 ;Lee et al, 2005;Grinshpun et al, 2009;Oestenstad et al, 1990Oestenstad et al, , 2010. Facial features affect the flow field near the nose or mouth of a breathing human (Anthony et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%