2012
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00662.2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of eye position information in the monkey inferior colliculus

Abstract: Bulkin DA, Groh JM. Distribution of eye position information in the monkey inferior colliculus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This spatiotemporal pattern of spikes continues to encode relevant features of the stimulus but is also powerfully modulated by non-sensory factors such as emotion, learning, attention and motor planning [3, 6, 7, 2731]. While the neural circuitry for extrasensory modulation is exquisite and comparatively well understood in sensory neocortex [9, 12, 20, 25, 3236], additional modulatory networks in the thalamus [37] or midbrain [38] could provide a means for rapid and flexible adjustments of subcortical auditory [23, 3941] and visual [10, 42, 43] processing depending on task demands, attentional load and learning. Here, for example, we report reduced visually evoked responses in LG that nevertheless more accurately encode inter-flash interval when visual inputs are relevant to solving the behavioral task compared to when they are a distraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spatiotemporal pattern of spikes continues to encode relevant features of the stimulus but is also powerfully modulated by non-sensory factors such as emotion, learning, attention and motor planning [3, 6, 7, 2731]. While the neural circuitry for extrasensory modulation is exquisite and comparatively well understood in sensory neocortex [9, 12, 20, 25, 3236], additional modulatory networks in the thalamus [37] or midbrain [38] could provide a means for rapid and flexible adjustments of subcortical auditory [23, 3941] and visual [10, 42, 43] processing depending on task demands, attentional load and learning. Here, for example, we report reduced visually evoked responses in LG that nevertheless more accurately encode inter-flash interval when visual inputs are relevant to solving the behavioral task compared to when they are a distraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, eye position sensitivity appeared to be more common among neurons insensitive to sound location (up to 32% for sound location sensitive units and 56% for insensitive units; Porter et al, 2006), suggesting somewhat segregated subpopulations for eye position and sound location sensitive units in the IC. Eye position sensitivity has also been found for vertical eye positions (Zwiers et al, 2004; Bulkin and Groh, 2012a), as well as during both task-related and spontaneous fixations, and with or without the presence of a concurrent sound stimulus (Porter et al, 2006; Bulkin and Groh, 2012a). Collectively, these results indicate that eye position signals are an important aspect of IC processing and are separable from signals related to head-centered sound location, vision, and eye movements.…”
Section: Non-auditory Influences On Neural Activity In Icmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The location of eye position sensitive cells within the IC was recently mapped in detail (Bulkin and Groh, 2012a) with respect to the functional response map previously described (Bulkin and Groh, 2011; see the section on “Vision and oculomotor influences,” and Figure 2). Eye position sensitivity was found throughout the IC, but the proportions varied according to the functional response patterns of the recording site.…”
Section: Non-auditory Influences On Neural Activity In Icmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binaural cue discrimination is also enhanced if subjects look toward the sound while keeping their head still [72 ], adding to the physiological evidence that eye position signals can modulate activity in the auditory system [73]. Another recent study failed to find an effect of eye position on human auditory cortical responses, but did show that responses to task-irrelevant sounds can be influenced by transient changes in attended visual stimuli that predict the timing of sound onset [74].…”
Section: Visual Influences On Auditory Spatial Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%