Distribution of environmental performance in life cycle assessments—implications for environmental benchmarking

Abstract

Purpose Life cycle assessment (LCA) is considered a robust method to analyse the environmental impacts of products and is used in public and private market applications such as Green Public Procurement (GPP) and Environmental Management Systems (EMS). Despite the usefulness of the methodology, difficulties exist with the interpretation of LCA results. The use of benchmarks can facilitate this process, but there is yet little research on the definition of environmental benchmarks. The aim of this paper is to analyse the distribution of environmental performance used for the definition of the benchmark and how it effects the use in selected product categories. Method LCA results from 54 Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) for insulation materials and 49 EPDs for bakery products are tested for their distribution. The outcome from the statistical analysis is used to compare and evaluate three calculation methods for a benchmark. Results and discussion The results of the study show that distributions and mid- and end-points of environmental performances of the studied indicators differ significantly for the two product categories. While some indicators for bakery products were closer to a normal distribution, most of the indicators are not normally distributed. This is reflected in the comparison of the chosen calculation methods for a benchmark, which showed that the distribution of the data affects the classification of the benchmark as well as the position of values on the benchmark. Conclusion The results emphasise that analysis of further product groups and the associated distribution of the environmental performance is needed to understand the implications of calculation methods on a benchmark. The availability of comparatively large datasets in a common structure is crucial for these analyses and can be facilitated through the digitalisation of LCA- and EPD-information. Furthermore, more research is needed on the communication formats for different benchmarking options, which must be applied for the different intended audiences to be effective.

Creating an indicator system for the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in communities and municipalities: Application and analysis in an Austrian case study

“…Ding and Liu [59] compared three benchmarking approaches, and they propose that policymakers should apply multiple benchmarking tools. Welling and Ryding [60] identified life cycle assessment as an effective method for environmental impact measurement and Hollberg et al [61] found that life cycle assessment-based benchmarks have been used as certification systems on the building level.…”

Sustainability Assessment of Cementitious Ceramic Tile Adhesives

“…In connection with the problems described above, attempts have been made to develop a new environmental scoring methodology for construction products based on LCA [48]. Benchmarking methods are also used regarding their applicability to the EPD's interpretation [49,50].…”

Environmental Product Declarations – an extensive collection of availability, EN15804 revision and the ILCD+EPD format

“…The included life cycle modules from the EPD. These boundaries are defined according to the standards, concerning the production stage (A1-A3), the construction stage (A4-A5), the use stage (B1-B7), the end-of-life (EoL) stage (C1-C4), and last the benefits beyond the system boundary (D) [12], [13], [18].…”