2005
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/38/16/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of distance in the spheroid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, average household distance to an affected resource would be a monotonic function of market area for a circular market with the affected resource at the centroid, and population randomly distributed. Similar relationships hold for other distance measures and bounded shapes, as established by the theory of distance in bounded areas (García-Pelayo 2005). Finally, the expected economic value of environmental quality change is often related to the availability of proximate substitutes and complements (Ghermandi and Nunes 2013;Johnston et al 2002b;Schaafsma 2015;Schaafsma et al 2012).…”
Section: Geospatial Variables In Meta-analysis and Benefit Transfermentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For example, average household distance to an affected resource would be a monotonic function of market area for a circular market with the affected resource at the centroid, and population randomly distributed. Similar relationships hold for other distance measures and bounded shapes, as established by the theory of distance in bounded areas (García-Pelayo 2005). Finally, the expected economic value of environmental quality change is often related to the availability of proximate substitutes and complements (Ghermandi and Nunes 2013;Johnston et al 2002b;Schaafsma 2015;Schaafsma et al 2012).…”
Section: Geospatial Variables In Meta-analysis and Benefit Transfermentioning
confidence: 75%
“…According to Equation 3, in a reference state with uncorrelated positions of atoms i and j [i.e., pðx i ;x j Þ ¼ pðx i Þpðx j Þ], the normalization function nðr; aÞ is equal to the distance pdf p REF m;n ðr; aÞ. Although p REF m;n ðr; aÞ and nðr; aÞ for a sphere have already been calculated (Deltheli 1919;Hammersley 1950;Lord 1954;de Smith 1977;Tu and Fischbach 2002;Garcia-Pelayo 2005), we re-derive them here for completeness.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and 6 = 17 126 · 3 1/2 + 3 73 3150 · 3 1/2 + 31 1050 · 3 1/2 + 9 70 · 3 1/2 = 664 1575 · 3 1/2 ≈ 0.243404.…”
Section: B Example: the Equilateral Triangleunclassified