2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74354-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of disease-causing germline mutations in coiled-coils implies an important role of their N-terminal region

Abstract: Next-generation sequencing resulted in the identification of a huge number of naturally occurring variations in human proteins. The correct interpretation of the functional effects of these variations necessitates the understanding of how they modulate protein structure. Coiled-coils are α-helical structures responsible for a diverse range of functions, but most importantly, they facilitate the structural organization of macromolecular scaffolds via oligomerization. In this study, we analyzed a comprehensive s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The N‐terminal coiled‐coil domain 1 binds dynein and dynactin, the C‐terminal coiled‐coil domain 3 binds cargo, and the coiled‐coil domain 2 interacts with kinesin‐1 (Urnavicius et al, 2015). According to MARCOIL and PCOILS prediction algorithms (Delorenzi & Speed, 2002; Gruber et al, 2006), Glu515Lys in the coiled‐coil 2 domain changes the polarity of an amino acid in the “c” position of the a–g heptad building block of the coiled coil (Kalman et al, 2020). We postulate that substitution of a positively charged Lys for the outward facing negatively charged Glu515 destabilizes interaction of the BICD2 with kinesin‐1 and impedes transport of vesicles to microtubular plus ends, that is, cellular periphery (Grigoriev et al, 2007; Splinter et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The N‐terminal coiled‐coil domain 1 binds dynein and dynactin, the C‐terminal coiled‐coil domain 3 binds cargo, and the coiled‐coil domain 2 interacts with kinesin‐1 (Urnavicius et al, 2015). According to MARCOIL and PCOILS prediction algorithms (Delorenzi & Speed, 2002; Gruber et al, 2006), Glu515Lys in the coiled‐coil 2 domain changes the polarity of an amino acid in the “c” position of the a–g heptad building block of the coiled coil (Kalman et al, 2020). We postulate that substitution of a positively charged Lys for the outward facing negatively charged Glu515 destabilizes interaction of the BICD2 with kinesin‐1 and impedes transport of vesicles to microtubular plus ends, that is, cellular periphery (Grigoriev et al, 2007; Splinter et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction of protein stability change (∆∆G) upon mutation is one of the most important unsolved problems of structural bioinformatics (Toplak et al, 2021;Kalman et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020;Pancotti et al, 2022;Pak & Ivankov, 2022). The recent success of AlphaFold in predicting 3D protein structure at near-to-experimental accuracy showed the perspectives of deep learning techniques for solving biological problems (Jumper et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein stability is a fundamental property of the protein native three-dimensional (3D) structure. Accurate prediction of folding free energy change upon amino acid mutation facilitates enzyme redesign [1], pathogenicity assessment [2], and optimization of thermostability [3] as well as characterizes our understanding of protein folding principles. Experimental measurements of protein stability change upon mutation are laborious and time-consuming, making computational prediction highly important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%