1981
DOI: 10.1080/00021369.1981.10864500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Cysteine Desulfhydrase in Microorganisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of the isotopic distributions of 2H and/or 34S in the bound serine, cysteine, and methionine were performed by GC-MS of the N-trifluoroacetyl n-butyl ester derivative of methionine, the N,O-trifluoroacetyl n-butyl ester derivative of serine, and the S-methyl-N-trifluoroacetyl n-butyl ester derivative of cysteine. (Brueggeman et al, 1962;Wiebers & Garner, 1967); (d) cysteine desulfhydrase (Fromageot, 1951;Ohkishi et al, 1981); (e) enzymatic or nonenzymatic reductive cleavage by intracellular thiols, Le., glutathione (Flavin, 1962); (f) 0-cystathionase (Flavin & Slaughter, 1964;Delavier-Klutchko & Flavin, 1965b); (g) decomposition into sulfane sulfur and cysteine (Flavin, 1962); (h) transamination (Rudman & Meister, 1953); (i) mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (Meister et al, 1954;Vachek & Wood, 1972); 6) reduction of sulfane sulfur [So] to sulfide catalyzed by sulfane reductase. The reaction could proceed with or without the involvement of rhodanese (Westley, 1981).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Analyses of the isotopic distributions of 2H and/or 34S in the bound serine, cysteine, and methionine were performed by GC-MS of the N-trifluoroacetyl n-butyl ester derivative of methionine, the N,O-trifluoroacetyl n-butyl ester derivative of serine, and the S-methyl-N-trifluoroacetyl n-butyl ester derivative of cysteine. (Brueggeman et al, 1962;Wiebers & Garner, 1967); (d) cysteine desulfhydrase (Fromageot, 1951;Ohkishi et al, 1981); (e) enzymatic or nonenzymatic reductive cleavage by intracellular thiols, Le., glutathione (Flavin, 1962); (f) 0-cystathionase (Flavin & Slaughter, 1964;Delavier-Klutchko & Flavin, 1965b); (g) decomposition into sulfane sulfur and cysteine (Flavin, 1962); (h) transamination (Rudman & Meister, 1953); (i) mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (Meister et al, 1954;Vachek & Wood, 1972); 6) reduction of sulfane sulfur [So] to sulfide catalyzed by sulfane reductase. The reaction could proceed with or without the involvement of rhodanese (Westley, 1981).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is likely that the microorganisms selected for in this work did not represent the spectrum of microorganisms in the same relative proportions as existed in the soil samples. The enzyme cysthathionine -y-lyase appears to be more prevalent in the actinomycetes and fungi (30), whereas cysteine desulfhydrase appears to be mainly of bacterial origin (26,31). We may have selected a large bacterial component in our enrichment cultures and thus that microbial group primarily responsible for cysteine desulfhydrase production.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thiocysteine then reacts nonenzymatically with cysteine or other sulfhydryl-containing compounds to yield H2S and cystine. Cysteine desulfhydrase activity was found to be widespread in bacteria and present in 1 of 27 fungal strains, but not present in 14 strains of actinomycetes and 30 strains of yeasts (26,31). In contrast, cystathionine -y-lyase activity has been found mainly in actinomycetes and eucaryotic microorganisms (11,30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controls lacking substrate, or containing substrate but not sand were included, and all assays were incubated at 37~ Arylsulphohydrolase activity was assayed using p-nitrophenyl sulphate (1 ml, 5 mM) as substrate and acetate buffer (4ml, 0.5 M, pH 5.8) 13 and thiosulphate sulphurtransferase by the method of Tabatabai and Singh 14. Cysteine desulphohydrase was assayed following a modification of the method of Ohkishi et al 8. Reaction mixtures contained sand (1 g); tris-HCl buffer (3 ml, 0.2 M, pH 8.3); L-cysteine (1 ml, 5 mM in Tris-HC1 buffer) and pyridoxal-phosphate (1 ml, 0.2 M in Tris-HCl buffer).…”
Section: Enzyme Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%