2003
DOI: 10.1007/s003550200207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of coalitional power in randomized multi-valued social choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 This is the case commonly considered, for example, in social choice contexts. Nandeibam (2003). We proceed to clarify how our NC relates to earlier, analogous, restrictions in the literature.…”
Section: Contraction Consistency and The Weak Axiom Of Stochastic Revmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…6 This is the case commonly considered, for example, in social choice contexts. Nandeibam (2003). We proceed to clarify how our NC relates to earlier, analogous, restrictions in the literature.…”
Section: Contraction Consistency and The Weak Axiom Of Stochastic Revmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…contraction consistency (NC) and the weak axiom of stochastic revealed preference (WASRP), in section 3. Our NC expands Nandeibam's (2003) notion of regularity to permit universal sets which are not-necessarily finite, whereas our WASRP expands the version in Dasgupta and Pattanaik (2007) to permit multi-valued choice. In section 3, we also clarify how our two consistency postulates subsume and unify various analogous notions available in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations