1996
DOI: 10.2307/3284187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Chewing Lice upon the Polygynous Peacock Pavo cristatus

Abstract: An opportunistic survey of louse distribution upon the peacock Pavo cristatus was undertaken following a cull of 23 birds from an English zoo. After complete skin and feather dissolution, 2 species of lice were retrieved, Goniodes pavonis and Amyrsidea minuta. The distribution of both louse species could be described by a negative binomial model. The significance of this is discussed in relation to transmission dynamics of lice in the atypical avian mating system found in the peacock, which involves no male pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantify ectoparasite load, I examined body feathers 2–4 months after they were collected. Parasitic chewing lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) are common in feral peafowl (Petrie et al 1996, Stewart et al 1996, Hollamby et al 2003), and remained attached to the feather barbs, where they were counted under a dissecting microscope; other ectoparasites were not observed, neither on the feathers nor on the birds during handling. A direct energetic cost of feather lice has been demonstrated experimentally in birds (Booth et al 1993), and increased infestation can result from poor health states (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify ectoparasite load, I examined body feathers 2–4 months after they were collected. Parasitic chewing lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) are common in feral peafowl (Petrie et al 1996, Stewart et al 1996, Hollamby et al 2003), and remained attached to the feather barbs, where they were counted under a dissecting microscope; other ectoparasites were not observed, neither on the feathers nor on the birds during handling. A direct energetic cost of feather lice has been demonstrated experimentally in birds (Booth et al 1993), and increased infestation can result from poor health states (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, seven infested peafowls provided 28 specimens of two species of genus Goniodes Nitzsch 1818 [1] [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Nymphs were also isolated but not included in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Indian Peafowl, Pavo cristatus L. has been studied for its chewing lice infestation in different regions of the world [5,6,7,8,9,10,11] and harbors 12 species of chewing lice on it [3,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researches reveal that the lice do not only affect the vitality and productivity of its hosts but also act as reservoir and transmitter of strains of various infectious pathogen among them (Derylo, 1974 andSaxena et al, 1985). The prevalence and infestation intensity of different phthirapteran ectoparasites on certain avian hosts namely, sparrow (Hoyle, 1938 andWoodman andDicke, 1954), starlings (Boyd, 1951), blackbirds (Baum, 1968), alcids (Eveleigh and Threlfall, 1976), procellariiform birds (Fowler et al, 1984), wood ducks (Thul, 1985), reed bunting (Fowler and Williams, 1985), Wilson's petrels and storm petrels (Fowler and Price, 1987), leach's petrels (Fowler and Hodson, 1988), Manx shearwaters (Fowler and Shaw, 1989), five shorebird species (Hunter and Colwell, 1994), house martins (Clark et al, 1994), swifts (Lee and Clayton, 1995), pied flycatcher (Potti and Merino, 1995), peacocks (Stewart et al, 1996), Spanis raptors (Perez et al, 1996), bee eaters (Kristofik et al, 1996;Hoi et al, 1998 andDarolova et al, 2001), pigeon (Dranzoa et al, 1999;Mushi et al, 2000), california quail (Gonzalez et al, 2003), Indian Red Avadavat (Gupta et al, 2007) have been noted by selected workers. Only a few workers have examined birds belonging to different orders from this point of view (Ash, 1960;Klockenhoff et al, 1973;Stranger and Palma, 1998;Oniki, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%