Abstract:Distribution of Al-, Fe-and Mn-pools was investigated in five forest soil profiles (consisting of four horizons) in each of two Hunan catchments (BLT and LKS) where acid deposition has been considered critical. Al-and Fe-pools were higher in BLT than those in LKS, but Mn-pools much lower in BLT. Mn-pools vary from topsoils to bottom soils, but there are different trends for different Mn speciation. Al-and Fe-pools, except amorphous Fe ox , were positively correlated to contents of soil organic matter (OM) show… Show more
“…2006; Zhou et al. 2003), we can safely conclude that Ex‐Fe is the most direct source of available Fe in soils, which is in agreement with other findings (Agbenin 2003; Xue et al. 2006; Young et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results showed that Ex‐Fe was positively related to DTPA‐Fe concentration at P < 0.01. In view of the fact that Ex‐Fe is the most available Fe in soils for plant absorption (Agbenin 2003; Xue et al. 2006; Young et al.…”
Soil Fe fractions and availability vary with landscape positions, because landscape position affects soil chemical properties and water conditions. In the present study, we investigated Fe fractions and availability at selected landscape positions in the loessial gully region of northwestern China. Four landscape positions, plateau, slope, terrace, and gully bottom were investigated. For each landscape position, soil samples were collected at 20-cm increments to a depth of 80 cm. Iron in the soil samples was fractionated by a modified sequential extraction method. Available Fe was assessed by diethylene thiamine pentacetic acid (DTPA) extraction procedure. The results showed that soil profile distributions of DTPA-Fe varied greatly with landscape position in the study area. The largest content of DTPA-Fe content was observed in the plateau soils, while the smallest content was observed in the gully bottom soils. Iron in soils existed mainly in the mineral bound fraction, which accounted for about 73 to 96% of the total Fe. The content of Fe in soil fractions varied greatly with landscape position. Exchangeable Fe and organic matter bound Fe were direct sources of available Fe, but exchangeable Fe contributed little to the total available Fe due to its low content in the soils. Oxides bound Fe was an indirect source of available Fe. The results of the present study indicate that landscape position strongly influences soil profile distribution and capacity of available Fe by influencing soil Fe fractions and organic matter distributions.
“…2006; Zhou et al. 2003), we can safely conclude that Ex‐Fe is the most direct source of available Fe in soils, which is in agreement with other findings (Agbenin 2003; Xue et al. 2006; Young et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results showed that Ex‐Fe was positively related to DTPA‐Fe concentration at P < 0.01. In view of the fact that Ex‐Fe is the most available Fe in soils for plant absorption (Agbenin 2003; Xue et al. 2006; Young et al.…”
Soil Fe fractions and availability vary with landscape positions, because landscape position affects soil chemical properties and water conditions. In the present study, we investigated Fe fractions and availability at selected landscape positions in the loessial gully region of northwestern China. Four landscape positions, plateau, slope, terrace, and gully bottom were investigated. For each landscape position, soil samples were collected at 20-cm increments to a depth of 80 cm. Iron in the soil samples was fractionated by a modified sequential extraction method. Available Fe was assessed by diethylene thiamine pentacetic acid (DTPA) extraction procedure. The results showed that soil profile distributions of DTPA-Fe varied greatly with landscape position in the study area. The largest content of DTPA-Fe content was observed in the plateau soils, while the smallest content was observed in the gully bottom soils. Iron in soils existed mainly in the mineral bound fraction, which accounted for about 73 to 96% of the total Fe. The content of Fe in soil fractions varied greatly with landscape position. Exchangeable Fe and organic matter bound Fe were direct sources of available Fe, but exchangeable Fe contributed little to the total available Fe due to its low content in the soils. Oxides bound Fe was an indirect source of available Fe. The results of the present study indicate that landscape position strongly influences soil profile distribution and capacity of available Fe by influencing soil Fe fractions and organic matter distributions.
“…This theory is confirmed by results of research conducted by Kobierski (2004), where the highest amounts of Mn and Fe forms extracted with DTPA were determined in topsoils. Xue et al (2006) point to the existence of a relationship between Fe and the OM content, while at the same time stressing the possibility that this phenomenon may be intensified as a result of OM accumulation in soil. The cited authors do not, however, point to a connection between OM and Mn ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…These elements are used by plants in small amounts (Walna et al, 2010). In the soil environment, Mn and Fe form numerous compounds and their bioavailability is conditioned by soil properties, mainly by the redox potential and pH (Xue et al, 2006). According to Livens (1991), Mn and Fe, which can be found in topsoils, can form complex bonds with OM and remain available for plants in this form.…”
“…To date, an increasing number of studies (Kelderman and Osman, 2007;Xue et al, 2006) have focused on heavy metal fractions in sediments, which should provide more information about environmental impacts on bioavailability. However, in these investigations, the hydrodynamic conditions were not adequately taken into consideration.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.