2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0891-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of a folivorous lemur in relation to seasonally varying food resources: integrating quantitative and qualitative aspects of food characteristics

Abstract: The goal of this study was to assess the relative importance of food availability and its quality for the spatial distribution of a folivorous lemur species, Lepilemur ruficaudatus, from the highly seasonal dry deciduous forest of Madagascar. Males and females of this species showed opposite changes of body mass and body condition during the dry and the wet season. Male body mass declined during the dry season that coincides with mating, while female body mass remained constant. During the wet season that coin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
92
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
7
92
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They survive the lean season by keeping an extremely low metabolic rate and low levels of activity (Schmid and Ganzhorn 1996). Their abundance correlates with the product of quantity (number of food trees) and quality (protein to fiber ratio) of young leaves during the food-abundant wet season (Ganzhorn 2002). This index would likely correlate with the quantity of young leaves that is above a certain level of nutritional quality, thus the findings of this species support our hypothesis.…”
Section: Coping With Seasonality: Two Hypotheses On Resource Limitationsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They survive the lean season by keeping an extremely low metabolic rate and low levels of activity (Schmid and Ganzhorn 1996). Their abundance correlates with the product of quantity (number of food trees) and quality (protein to fiber ratio) of young leaves during the food-abundant wet season (Ganzhorn 2002). This index would likely correlate with the quantity of young leaves that is above a certain level of nutritional quality, thus the findings of this species support our hypothesis.…”
Section: Coping With Seasonality: Two Hypotheses On Resource Limitationsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Milton (1979) proposed that the protein-to-fiber ratio of leaves was an important criterion for leaf selection by primates, whereby leaves with higher protein and low fiber ratios were selected. This preference has been demonstrated for a large number of primates Ganzhorn 2002;Hanya and Bernard 2012). Fiber is often considered an antifeedant because it requires fermentation by symbiotic microbes and the cellulose and hemicellulose components of the fiber is typically only partially digestible by folivores (McNab 2002).…”
Section: Previous Studies On Primate Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the capacity for storing nutrients and the synchronization of reproductive stages, including the period weaning infants, to the seasonal fluctuations of food, also contribute to the improvement of their diet after scarce periods and thereby to their reproductive success. The storage capacity has been also described for red‐tailed sportive lemurs ( Lepilemur ruficaudatus) , another folivorous lemur species inhabiting the same forest (Ganzhorn, 2002; but see also Dröscher, Rothman, Ganzhorn, & Kappeler, 2016 for Lepilemur leucopus ). Likewise, storage capacity is one prerequisite for hibernation in gray mouse lemurs ( Microcebus murinus) and fat‐tailed dwarf lemurs ( Cheirogaleus medius , Dausmann, 2014; Schmid, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Many researchers have cited geographic variation in rainfall as the proximate factor influencing lemur evolutionary ecology (Albrecht and Miller, 1993;Albrecht et al, 1990;Ganzhorn, 2002;Godfrey et al, 1990Godfrey et al, , 2004Lehman et al, 2005;Ravosa et al, 1993Ravosa et al, , 1995Wright, 1999). Ultimately, rainfall is taken as an indirect measure of forest productivity (Kay et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%