2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-010-9477-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of 45S and 5S rDNA sites in 23 species of Eleocharis (Cyperaceae)

Abstract: Studies of rDNA location in holocentric chromosomes of the Cyperaceae are scarce, but a few reports have indicated the occurrence of multiple 45S rDNA sites at terminal positions, and in the decondensed state of these regions in prometaphase/metaphase. To extend our knowledge of the number 45S and 5S rDNA sites and distribution in holocentric chromosomes of the Cyperaceae, 23 Brazilian species of Eleocharis were studied. FISH showed 45S rDNA signals always located in terminal regions, which varied from two (E.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NORs have been widely and successfully used as cytogenetic markers to assess patterns of chromosomal evolution particularly in nonmammalian organisms for which banding data are less tractable (Gallagher et al, 1999;Cabrero and Camacho, 2008;Raskina et al, 2008;Carvalho et al, 2009;Nguyen et al, 2010;da Silva et al, 2010). However, these investigations often included only one or a few individuals per species, so population surveys of NOR variability using FISH remain scarce (Veltsos et al, 2009).…”
Section: Consequences For Phylogenetic Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…NORs have been widely and successfully used as cytogenetic markers to assess patterns of chromosomal evolution particularly in nonmammalian organisms for which banding data are less tractable (Gallagher et al, 1999;Cabrero and Camacho, 2008;Raskina et al, 2008;Carvalho et al, 2009;Nguyen et al, 2010;da Silva et al, 2010). However, these investigations often included only one or a few individuals per species, so population surveys of NOR variability using FISH remain scarce (Veltsos et al, 2009).…”
Section: Consequences For Phylogenetic Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number and position of the rDNA clusters are often species-specific, these chromosomal characters have been widely used in systematics and phylogenetic reconstructions. Studies on NOR variation in numerous plant, insect and vertebrate groups have invariably described changes in the number and chromosomal location of NORs even in closely related species, suggesting that rDNA clusters are highly mobile components of the genome (Gallagher et al, 1999;Datson and Murray, 2006;Cabrero and Camacho, 2008;Nguyen et al, 2010;da Silva et al, 2010;Cazaux et al, 2011). This important inter-species lability is generated either by chromosomal rearrangements or transposition events (Eickbush and Eickbush, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrasting with the significant amount of published data on the karyological features of some genera of Cyperaceae, such as Carex, Eleocharis and Rhynchospora (Vanzela & Guerra 2000;Roalson 2008;Silva et al 2010;Cabral et al 2014), very little is known about the chromatin organization in Cyperus species. In fact, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that heterochromatic regions are evidenced in chromosomes of Cyperus species by means of fluorochrome banding.…”
Section: Karyotype Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In fact, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that heterochromatic regions are evidenced in chromosomes of Cyperus species by means of fluorochrome banding. Consequently, it is hard to know if the coincident number of nucleolar organizer regions (NORs), which were evidenced by both CMA/DAPI and silver nitrate staining, indicates some conserved feature within the genus, as reported for other groups of Cyperaceae (Silva et al 2010). Thus, even sharing the same number of active NORs, the different ranges of chromosome number variation among sympatric individuals of C. odoratus and C. ligularis reinforces the assumption of a clear separation of the two species.…”
Section: Karyotype Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%