2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution network design: New problems and related models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
124
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
124
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…see Sule et al (1988), Ambrosino and Scutellà (2005), Gebennini et al (2007), Manzini et al (2007b). …”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…see Sule et al (1988), Ambrosino and Scutellà (2005), Gebennini et al (2007), Manzini et al (2007b). …”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to the Ambrosino and Scutella, (2005), while analyzing a distribution network, two factors can be distinguished such as the optimization of the flows of goods: in this case it is considered an existing distribution network, and need to optimize the flows of goods through the network; and the improvement of the existing network: in this case need to choose the best configuration of the facilities in the network in order to satisfy the goals of the company, while minimizing the overall costs. There are extensive literatures available on the analysis of supply chain coordination.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nekooghadirli et al (2014) presented a bi-objective and multi-product model for the LIRP problem where the total cost and maximum average time of delivering products to customers is minimized, simultaneously. Ambrosino and Scutella (2005) have considered the LIRP problem with four layers including the plant, central warehouse, regional warehouses and customers. The aim of their problem was to determine the location and number of different facilities in a new network or to improve an existing network.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%