2005
DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(2005)154[0358:dhualh]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution, Habitat Use and Life History of Stream-dwelling Crayfish in the Spring River Drainage of Arkansas and Missouri with a Focus on the Imperiled Mammoth Spring Crayfish (Orconectes marchandi)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
54
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gore and Bryant (1990) found that O. neglectus partition their habitats, with young typically found in moderate-velocity (25-45 cm/s) cobble habitats and adults in low-velocity (0 cm/s) macrophyte beds or high-velocity ([65 cm/s) cobbled habitats. However, other studies (Flinders and Magoulick 2005;Magoulick and DiStefano 2007) reported no significant difference in habitat selection by different size classes of O. neglectus or O. n. chaenodactylus (Williams 1952). The range of water depth, current velocities, and substrate in riffles measured in our study were comparable with previously reported values (Flinders and Magoulick 2005;Magoulick and DiStefano 2007;Rabalais and Magoulick 2006 [3), possibly explaining the lower densities of O. n. neglectus in Shoal Creek, which was significantly deeper than the other streams sampled in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gore and Bryant (1990) found that O. neglectus partition their habitats, with young typically found in moderate-velocity (25-45 cm/s) cobble habitats and adults in low-velocity (0 cm/s) macrophyte beds or high-velocity ([65 cm/s) cobbled habitats. However, other studies (Flinders and Magoulick 2005;Magoulick and DiStefano 2007) reported no significant difference in habitat selection by different size classes of O. neglectus or O. n. chaenodactylus (Williams 1952). The range of water depth, current velocities, and substrate in riffles measured in our study were comparable with previously reported values (Flinders and Magoulick 2005;Magoulick and DiStefano 2007;Rabalais and Magoulick 2006 [3), possibly explaining the lower densities of O. n. neglectus in Shoal Creek, which was significantly deeper than the other streams sampled in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, other studies (Flinders and Magoulick 2005;Magoulick and DiStefano 2007) reported no significant difference in habitat selection by different size classes of O. neglectus or O. n. chaenodactylus (Williams 1952). The range of water depth, current velocities, and substrate in riffles measured in our study were comparable with previously reported values (Flinders and Magoulick 2005;Magoulick and DiStefano 2007;Rabalais and Magoulick 2006 [3), possibly explaining the lower densities of O. n. neglectus in Shoal Creek, which was significantly deeper than the other streams sampled in our study. The inverse relation between crayfish density and stream size (C5 orders) or watershed size may be related to the proportional decrease in allochthonous materials in larger streams (Vannote et al 1980), loss of habitat heterogeneity (Clark 2009;Mitchell and Smock 1991), smaller percentage of suitable habitat (Burkey and Simon 2010;DiStefano et al 2008;Lodge and Hill 1994;Westhoff et al 2006), or increased predation (Flinders and Magoulick 2003;Hill and Lodge 1995;Stein and Magnuson 1976).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have found other crayfish species to either favor 378 or disfavor smaller and potentially intermittent streams due to different tolerances to abiotic 379 factors like stream drying and biotic factors like longitudinally structured predator communities 380 (Flinders & Magoulick, 2005;Creed, 2006). However, as an exception to our finding that pilose 381 crayfishes did not historically occur in the smallest streams, we did find some positive 382 association between these crayfishes and the absolute smallest streams in our region as measured 383 by flow accumulation.…”
contrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Crayfish are keystone species in many stream ecosystems since they create and establish habitat use of other sympatric aquatic species. Crayfish are among the largest macroinvertebrates and limit access for other taxa to aquatic food web energy transfer [1][2][3][4]. Crayfish are ecosystem engineers that provide a vital role in the structure and function of stream ecosystems [5,6] by determining species distribution and placement within the stream benthic habitat [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%