1990
DOI: 10.2307/1368246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution, Density, and Age Structure of Spotted Owls on Two Southern California Habitat Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Sierra Nevada are farther north, higher in elevation, hold massive snowpack that irrigates lower elevations throughout the dry summer (Kattelmann ), and support a larger, more contiguous population of spotted owls relative to southern California's meta‐populations (LaHaye et al ). Furthermore, spotted owl surveys in the Sierra Nevada study were primarily associated with timber‐harvest projects in mixed‐conifer habitats, whereas the southern California study areas incorporated sites in all forested habitats within the SBM and SJM (Gutiérrez and Pritchard , LaHaye et al ), including vegetation types not typically monitored for spotted owls in the Sierra Nevada, such as pure hardwoods and conifer‐hardwood forests associated with chaparral (Smith ). Moreover, southern California owl sites associated with vegetation such as bigcone Douglas‐fir–canyon live oak forests have no corollary in the Sierra Nevada.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sierra Nevada are farther north, higher in elevation, hold massive snowpack that irrigates lower elevations throughout the dry summer (Kattelmann ), and support a larger, more contiguous population of spotted owls relative to southern California's meta‐populations (LaHaye et al ). Furthermore, spotted owl surveys in the Sierra Nevada study were primarily associated with timber‐harvest projects in mixed‐conifer habitats, whereas the southern California study areas incorporated sites in all forested habitats within the SBM and SJM (Gutiérrez and Pritchard , LaHaye et al ), including vegetation types not typically monitored for spotted owls in the Sierra Nevada, such as pure hardwoods and conifer‐hardwood forests associated with chaparral (Smith ). Moreover, southern California owl sites associated with vegetation such as bigcone Douglas‐fir–canyon live oak forests have no corollary in the Sierra Nevada.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In southern California, Spotted Owls inhabit isolated upper-elevation (915-1,525 m) forests surrounded by lower-elevation desert and semidesert vegetation (Gutiérrez and Pritchard 1990, Gutiérrez et al 1992, LaHaye et al 1994, 1997. Forest fires in these southern Californian forests occur largely as a result of human-caused ignition (Halsey 2005) and typically burn in a mosaic of severities (Weatherspoon et al 1992, Stephenson andCalcarone 1999), with the largest high-severity fires burning under extreme Santa Ana weather conditions typical of the region (Keeley et al 2009).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, nucleotide diversity tracks population size; thus, there might be many fewer California spotted owls than northern or Mexican spotted owls. However, this seems unlikely because recent surveys (e.g., Gutierrez and Pritchard 1990;Gutierrez 1994;Gutierrez et al 1995;U.S. Department of the Interior 1995) suggest that the population of birds in the Sierra Nevada, San Bernardino Mountains, and on Mount San Jacinto is approximately one-half to one-third of the number of northern spotted owls, not one-tenth or less (the number of Mexican spotted owls is poorly known, especially in Mexico).…”
Section: Genetic Variation Within Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%