2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40068-018-0117-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution characteristics of cadmium and lead in particle size fractions of farmland soils in a lead–zinc mine area in Southwest China

Abstract: Background: Cd and Pb were the main pollution elements in Pb-Zn mining areas. Several studies have focused on heavy metal pollution and risk assessment in the Huize Pb-Zn mining area. In the present study, the soil aggregate composition, chemical properties, contents and chemical fractions of Cd and Pb were analysed in soils at depths of 0-60 cm in the Huize Pb-Zn mining area. Agricultural soils were sampled at depths of 0-20, 20-40 and 40-60 cm surrounding the Pb-Zn mine. The particle size fractions were dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples HS-2 and 3-UN had Pb-O bond distances of 2.32 Å, which is in between Pb-O distances for birnessite (2.30 Å) and hydroxypyromorphite (2.33 Å), and 1-UN had a Pb-O distance of 2.26 Å consistent with goethite (2.27 Å). This is in agreement with results of the sequential extraction for these samples, which indicates most Pb was present in the reducible fraction (Figure 3a, Particle size distribution is important when studying urban soils as soil components and particle aggregates may control the mobility of heavy metals, with Pb usually associated with micro-aggregates and smaller sized particles [69]. Particle size distribution of Pb was determined by a single-step extraction for samples 1-UN, 3-UN, 3-PL, and HS-2 from Sites 1 and 2 that reported extractable Pb in exceedance of the NJDEP RDCSRS (Figure 4b, Table S8).…”
Section: X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy (Xafs)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Samples HS-2 and 3-UN had Pb-O bond distances of 2.32 Å, which is in between Pb-O distances for birnessite (2.30 Å) and hydroxypyromorphite (2.33 Å), and 1-UN had a Pb-O distance of 2.26 Å consistent with goethite (2.27 Å). This is in agreement with results of the sequential extraction for these samples, which indicates most Pb was present in the reducible fraction (Figure 3a, Particle size distribution is important when studying urban soils as soil components and particle aggregates may control the mobility of heavy metals, with Pb usually associated with micro-aggregates and smaller sized particles [69]. Particle size distribution of Pb was determined by a single-step extraction for samples 1-UN, 3-UN, 3-PL, and HS-2 from Sites 1 and 2 that reported extractable Pb in exceedance of the NJDEP RDCSRS (Figure 4b, Table S8).…”
Section: X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy (Xafs)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…In nature, the increase in Cd pollution is mainly due to human activities, including mining, metal smelting processes, Cd-rich phosphate fertilizers, industrial effluents, and fuel production [147,148]; the International Agency for Research on Cancer categorized it as a group 1 carcinogen [149]. Due to the high solubility of Cd, heavy rains, field irrigation, fine soil particles, and preferential flow cause the leaching of Cd from the surface layers of the soil to the subsoil, which is a factor in increasing Cd pollution in groundwater [150][151][152].…”
Section: Cadmium (Cd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no clear answer to the question of the role of SOM in metal retention in soils (Bārdule et al, 2022; Christl et al, 2005; Donisa et al, 2003; Mi et al, 2018; Quenea et al, 2009; X. S. Wang, 2008). Metal depletion of soils with high organic matter content may result from the solubilising effect of SOM, whereas metal accumulation may be due to the strong association of metal and organic matter in solid phase (Staunton, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, regardless of molecular weight, inactive or blocked chelators do not alter the soil's ability to retain elements, even in the presence of significant amounts of SOM (Christl et al, 2001; He et al, 2020; Pandey et al, 2000). The observed discrepancies may also be due to the fact that the above‐mentioned studies refer to soil samples taken from various depths, which may contain different soil horizons characterised by different OM contents, rather than individual soil horizons (Bārdule et al, 2022; Christl et al, 2005; Donisa et al, 2003; Mi et al, 2018; Quenea et al, 2009; X. S. Wang, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation