2005
DOI: 10.1128/aem.71.5.2695-2704.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and Stability of Sulfate-Reducing Prokaryotic and Hydrogenotrophic Methanogenic Assemblages in Nutrient-Impacted Regions of the Florida Everglades

Abstract: Although the influence of phosphorus loading on the Everglades ecosystem has received a great deal of attention, most research has targeted macro indicators, such as those based on vegetation or fauna, or chemical and physical parameters involved in biogeochemical cycles. Fewer studies have addressed the role of microorganisms, and these have mainly targeted gross informative parameters such as microbial biomass, enzymatic activities, and microbial enumerations. The objectives of this study were to characteriz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
30
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil P concentrations in the samples used for this study were 1.28 g · kg Ϫ1 in site F1, the northernmost site; 0.59 g · kg Ϫ1 in site F4; and 0.25 g · kg Ϫ1 in site U3, the southernmost site (Table 1). These values are in good agreement with previously reported results (42,51). In contrast to the soil P concentration gradient, a sharp gradient in SO 4 2Ϫ concentrations was not observed in surface waters (176 to 200 M) or soil pore waters (39 to 56 M) (52).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The soil P concentrations in the samples used for this study were 1.28 g · kg Ϫ1 in site F1, the northernmost site; 0.59 g · kg Ϫ1 in site F4; and 0.25 g · kg Ϫ1 in site U3, the southernmost site (Table 1). These values are in good agreement with previously reported results (42,51). In contrast to the soil P concentration gradient, a sharp gradient in SO 4 2Ϫ concentrations was not observed in surface waters (176 to 200 M) or soil pore waters (39 to 56 M) (52).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A very large body of work has been published on changes that the P additions have brought to the greater WCA-2A ecosystem, ranging from the distribution of endangered vertebrates to changes in biogeochemical cycling (49,58). The present study builds on previous studies on the distribution and function of methanogenic and sulfidogenic guilds (10,42,51) and investigates controls on methanogenic pathways as a function of position along the nutrient gradient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfate-reducing guilds in U3 are dominated by incomplete acetate oxidizers (4,6), such that SRP may be limited in their ability to metabolize acetate in these soils. In addition, low sulfate concentrations in these microcosms likely prevented enrichment of SRP in U3 microcosms, possibly resulting in increased acetate accumulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in sloughs to dense stands of cattail (Typha domingensis Pers.). Significantly greater primary productivity in eutrophic regions resulted in greater carbon input to the soils, leading to greater peat accumulation (2,27,37) and higher rates of methanogenesis and anaerobic respiration (4)(5)(6)(7). Concomitant with larger amounts of available carbon in eutrophic regions are changes in the composition and increases in the sizes of specific microbial groups responsible for carbon cycling, such as methanogens, fermenters, and sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRP) (4-7, 14, 37; I. Uz and A. Ogram, submitted for publication).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methanogen-specific mcrA has been used as a molecular marker to study the distribution of methanogens in many terrestrial environments, including nutrient-impacted regions of the Florida Everglades (4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%