2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-015-4328-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and separation of metallic and radionuclidic impurities in the production of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose

Abstract: In this study the identification, determination and distribution of metallic and radionuclidic contaminants in the synthesis of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose are presented. Samples of irradiated 18 O-enriched water, purification columns (anionic, C18, Al 2 O 3 ), final product and wastes were examined. Metallic contaminants were determined by ICP-MS and the radionuclide impurities by high resolution germanium gamma-spectrometry. Fifteen radionuclides were identified in the samples. The enriched water contained catio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that, after washing the target, the tritium content in the water varies greatly according to the data of different researchers. Thus, according to [13], the specific activity of 3 H in the wash water is 1.4 Bq/mL, while the authors of [8] give a significantly higher value of 92 Bq/mL. The reason for this discrepancy is not quite clear, but it may be due to different target design, volume (1.3 and 2.4 mL), target material (Nb and Ti), target purging mode, volume of wash water, and number of production cycles before target purging.…”
Section: Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that, after washing the target, the tritium content in the water varies greatly according to the data of different researchers. Thus, according to [13], the specific activity of 3 H in the wash water is 1.4 Bq/mL, while the authors of [8] give a significantly higher value of 92 Bq/mL. The reason for this discrepancy is not quite clear, but it may be due to different target design, volume (1.3 and 2.4 mL), target material (Nb and Ti), target purging mode, volume of wash water, and number of production cycles before target purging.…”
Section: Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%